Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 5;12(1):20271.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24335-x.

A survey of vocal mimicry in companion parrots

Affiliations

A survey of vocal mimicry in companion parrots

Lauryn Benedict et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Parrots are one of the rare animal taxa with life-long vocal learning. Parrot vocal repertoires are difficult to study in the wild, but companion parrots offer a valuable data source. We surveyed the public about mimicry repertoires in companion parrots to determine whether vocal learning varied by (1) species, (2) sex, (3) age, and (4) social interaction with other parrots. Species differed significantly in mimicry ability, with grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) having the largest mimicry repertoires. Analyses of all birds (n = 877) found no overarching effects of sex, age, or parrot-parrot social interactions on mimicry repertoires. Follow up analyses (n = 671), however, revealed a human bias to assume that talking parrots are male, and indicated that five of the 19 best-sampled species exhibited sex differences. Age-specific analyses of grey parrots (n = 187) indicated that repertoire size did not increase during adulthood. Most parrots were capable of improvisation (e.g. rearranging words) and used mimicry in appropriate human contexts. Results indicate that parrot vocal production learning varies among and within species, suggesting that the mechanisms and functions of learning also vary. Our data provide a rich foundation for future comparative research on avian vocalizations, and broaden our understanding of the underpinnings of communicative behavior and learning across all animals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rates of (a) vocal improvisation via word reorganization in phrases and (b) contextual use of mimicked vocalizations by companion parrots.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (± SE) human mimicry sound, phrase, and word repertoires for 19 species of parrots. Letters following each bar indicate Tukey test statistical groupings—for each vocalization category, species not connected by a shared letter have significantly different repertoire sizes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sampling by sex of the 19 species with ≥ 10 individuals in the data set. Asterisks indicates species in which males are significantly overrepresented among birds sexed with low or medium confidence, relative to the group sexed with high confidence (Chi-squared *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

References

    1. Beecher MD. Why are no animal communication systems simple languages? Front. Psychol. 2021;12:701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.602635. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berwick RC, Friederici AD, Chomsky N, Bolhuis JJ. Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013;17:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nowicki S, Searcy WA. The evolution of vocal learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014;28:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Janik VM, Knörnschild M. Vocal production learning in mammals revisited. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2021;376:20200244. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0244. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jarvis E. Evolution of vocal learning and spoken language. Science. 2019;366:50–54. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0287. - DOI - PubMed