Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;31(5):1675-1689.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07260-4. Epub 2022 Dec 6.

Management after acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), part 2: management of the ACL-injured patient

Affiliations
Review

Management after acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), part 2: management of the ACL-injured patient

Wolf Petersen et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this consensus project was to create a treatment algorithm for the management of the ACL-injured patient which can serve as an aid in a shared decision-making process.

Methods: For this consensus process, a steering and a rating group were formed. In an initial face-to-face meeting, the steering group, together with the expert group, formed various key topic complexes for which various questions were formulated. For each key topic, a structured literature search was performed by the steering group. The results of the literature review were sent to the rating group with the option to give anonymous comments until a final consensus voting was performed. Sufficient consensus was defined as 80% agreement.

Results: During this consensus process, 15 key questions were identified. The literature search for each key question resulted in 24 final statements. Of these 24 final statements, all achieved consensus.

Conclusions: This consensus process has shown that ACL rupture is a complex injury, and the outcome depends to a large extent on the frequently concomitant injuries (meniscus and/or cartilage damage). These additional injuries as well as various patient-specific factors should play a role in the treatment decision. The present treatment algorithm represents a decision aid within the framework of a shared decision-making process for the ACL-injured patient.

Level of evidence: Level V.

Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Medial collateral ligament; Meniscus; Meniscus repair; Shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beard DJ, Dodd CAF, Trindle HR, Simpson AHRW (1994) Proprioception enhancement for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. A prospective randomised trial of two physiotherapy regimes. J Bone Joint Surg 76:654–659. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.76b4.8027158 - DOI
    1. Bumberger A, Koller U, Hofbauer M et al (2020) Ramp lesions are frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees and should be repaired in case of instability. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 28:840–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05521-3 - DOI
    1. Carson DW, Ford KR (2011) Sex differences in knee abduction during landing: A systematic review. Sports Health 3:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738111410180 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Carter HM, Littlewood C, Webster KE, Smith BE (2020) The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03676-6 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Chmielewski TL, Hurd WJ, Rudolph KS et al (2005) Perturbation training improves knee kinematics and reduces muscle co-contraction after complete unilateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Phys Ther 85:740–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/85.8.740 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources