Management after acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), part 2: management of the ACL-injured patient
- PMID: 36471029
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07260-4
Management after acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), part 2: management of the ACL-injured patient
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this consensus project was to create a treatment algorithm for the management of the ACL-injured patient which can serve as an aid in a shared decision-making process.
Methods: For this consensus process, a steering and a rating group were formed. In an initial face-to-face meeting, the steering group, together with the expert group, formed various key topic complexes for which various questions were formulated. For each key topic, a structured literature search was performed by the steering group. The results of the literature review were sent to the rating group with the option to give anonymous comments until a final consensus voting was performed. Sufficient consensus was defined as 80% agreement.
Results: During this consensus process, 15 key questions were identified. The literature search for each key question resulted in 24 final statements. Of these 24 final statements, all achieved consensus.
Conclusions: This consensus process has shown that ACL rupture is a complex injury, and the outcome depends to a large extent on the frequently concomitant injuries (meniscus and/or cartilage damage). These additional injuries as well as various patient-specific factors should play a role in the treatment decision. The present treatment algorithm represents a decision aid within the framework of a shared decision-making process for the ACL-injured patient.
Level of evidence: Level V.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Medial collateral ligament; Meniscus; Meniscus repair; Shared decision-making.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
References
-
- Beard DJ, Dodd CAF, Trindle HR, Simpson AHRW (1994) Proprioception enhancement for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. A prospective randomised trial of two physiotherapy regimes. J Bone Joint Surg 76:654–659. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.76b4.8027158 - DOI
-
- Bumberger A, Koller U, Hofbauer M et al (2020) Ramp lesions are frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees and should be repaired in case of instability. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 28:840–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05521-3 - DOI
-
- Carson DW, Ford KR (2011) Sex differences in knee abduction during landing: A systematic review. Sports Health 3:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738111410180 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Carter HM, Littlewood C, Webster KE, Smith BE (2020) The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03676-6 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Chmielewski TL, Hurd WJ, Rudolph KS et al (2005) Perturbation training improves knee kinematics and reduces muscle co-contraction after complete unilateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Phys Ther 85:740–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/85.8.740 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
