End-to-End Approach to Surfactant Selection, Risk Mitigation, and Control Strategies for Protein-Based Therapeutics
- PMID: 36471030
- DOI: 10.1208/s12248-022-00773-3
End-to-End Approach to Surfactant Selection, Risk Mitigation, and Control Strategies for Protein-Based Therapeutics
Erratum in
-
Correction: End-to-End Approach to Surfactant Selection, Risk Mitigation, and Control Strategies for Protein-Based Therapeutics.AAPS J. 2023 Jan 11;25(1):15. doi: 10.1208/s12248-023-00780-y. AAPS J. 2023. PMID: 36631711 No abstract available.
Abstract
A survey performed by the AAPS Drug Product Handling community revealed a general, mostly consensus, approach to the strategy for the selection of surfactant type and level for biopharmaceutical products. Discussing and building on the survey results, this article describes the common approach for surfactant selection and control strategy for protein-based therapeutics and focuses on key studies, common issues, mitigations, and rationale. Where relevant, each section is prefaced by survey responses from the 22 anonymized respondents. The article format consists of an overview of surfactant stabilization, followed by a strategy for the selection of surfactant level, and then discussions regarding risk identification, mitigation, and control strategy. Since surfactants that are commonly used in biologic formulations are known to undergo various forms of degradation, an effective control strategy for the chosen surfactant focuses on understanding and controlling the design space of the surfactant material attributes to ensure that the desired material quality is used consistently in DS/DP manufacturing. The material attributes of a surfactant added in the final DP formulation can influence DP performance (e.g., protein stability). Mitigation strategies are described that encompass risks from host cell proteins (HCP), DS/DP manufacturing processes, long-term storage, as well as during in-use conditions.
Keywords: Control strategy; Formulation stability; In use compatibility; Poloxamer; Polysorbate; Surfactant.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.
References
-
- Number of products and pipeline count per modality for commonly used surfactants. 22 December 2021.
-
- Bam NB, Randolph TW, Cleland JL. Stability of protein formulations: investigation of surfactant effects by a novel EPR spectroscopic technique. Pharm Res. 1995;12(1):2–11. - PubMed
-
- Misono T, et al. Surface adsorption and micelle formation of polyoxyethylene-type nonionic surfactants in mixtures of water and hydrophilic imidazolium-type ionic liquid. J Oleo Sci. 2016;65(6):499–506. - PubMed
-
- Khan T, Mahler H-C, Kishore R. Key interactions of surfactants in therapeutic protein formulations: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;97.
-
- Bam NB, et al. Tween protects recombinant human growth hormone against agitation-induced damage via hydrophobic interactions. J Pharm Sci. 1998;87(12):1554–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
