Prognostic value of left ventricular global constructive work in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
- PMID: 36471103
- DOI: 10.1007/s10554-022-02762-1
Prognostic value of left ventricular global constructive work in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and global constructive work (GCW) as prognostic variables in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA).
Methods: CA patients were retrospectively identified between 2015 and 2021 at a tertiary care hospital. Comprehensive clinical, biochemical, and imaging evaluation including two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography with myocardial work (MW) analysis was performed. A clinical combined endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission.
Results: 70 patients were followed for 16 (7-37) months and 37 (52.9%) reached the combined endpoint. Patient with versus without clinical events had a significantly lower LVEF (40.71% vs. 48.01%, p = 0.039), LVGLS (-9.26 vs. -11.32, p = 0.034) and GCW (1034.47mmHg% vs. 1424.86mmHg%, p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis showed that LVEF ( odds ratio (OR): 0.904; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.839-0.973, p = 0.007), LVGLS ( OR: 0.620; 95% CI: 0.415-0.926, p = 0.020) and GCW ( OR: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.990-0.999, p = 0.016) were significant predictors of outcome, but the model including GCW had the best discriminative ability to predict the combined endpoint (C-index = 0.888). A GCW less than 1443mmHg% was able to predict the clinical endpoint with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 64% (Area under the curve (AUC): 0.771 (95% CI: 0.581-0.961; p = 0.005)).
Conclusion: In CA patients, GCW may be of additional prognostic value to LVEF and GLS in predicting heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality.
Keywords: Cardiac amyloidosis; Global constructive work; Left ventricular global longitudinal strain; Myocardial work.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Maron BJ et al (2006) Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart failure and transplantation committee; quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functio. Circulation 113:1807–1816. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174287 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN “Systemic amyloidosis,” The Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10038. Lancet Publishing Group, pp. 2641–2654, Jun. 25, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X
-
- Ruberg FL, Grogan M, Hanna M, Kelly JW, Maurer MS (2019) “Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 73, no. 22. Elsevier USA, pp. 2872–2891, Jun. 11, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.003
-
- Maurer MS, Elliott P, Comenzo R, Semigran M, Rapezzi C (2017) “Addressing common questions encountered in the diagnosis and management of cardiac amyloidosis,” Circulation, vol. 135, no. 14, pp. 1357–1377, Apr. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024438
-
- Sperry BW, Saeed IM, Raza S, Kennedy KF, Hanna M, Spertus JA (2019) “Increasing Rate of Hospital Admissions in Patients With Amyloidosis (from the National Inpatient Sample),” Am. J. Cardiol, vol. 124, no. 11, pp. 1765–1769, Dec. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.045
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous