Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 8;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
doi: 10.1108/LHS-05-2022-0056.

The evaluation of health care leadership development programmes: a scoping review of reviews

Affiliations
Free article

The evaluation of health care leadership development programmes: a scoping review of reviews

Emily Burn et al. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). .
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report a scoping review of reviews which investigated HLDP evaluations to determine: how the conceptualisation of leadership development programmes (HLDPs), and despite growing calls for robust evaluations of their pedagogic design, delivery and effectiveness, there are concerns regarding the quality of data associated with their evaluation. This scoping review of reviews investigated the reporting of HLDP evaluations to determine: how the conceptualisation of leadership underpinning HLDPs influence their evaluation; how the pedagogical approaches within HLDPs influence their evaluation; and the evaluation designs and measures used to assess HLDPs.

Design/methodology/approach: The scoping review was conducted on reviews of HLDPs. Searches were performed on four databases and on the grey literature. Data were extracted and a narrative synthesis was developed.

Findings: Thirty-one papers were included in the scoping review of reviews. A great deal of heterogeneity in HLDPs was identified. Evaluations of HLDPs were affected by poor data quality, and there were limitations in the evidence about "what works". Leadership was conceptualised in different ways across HLDPs, and consequently, there was a lack of consistency as to what is being evaluated and the methods used to assess HLDPs.

Originality/value: This review of reviews summarises the current evidence on the evaluation of HLDPs. Evaluations of HLDPs need to explicitly account for the complexity of health systems, how this complexity impacts on the development and articulation of leadership practice, and how the underlying conceptualisation of leadership and the associated theory of change articulate a set of assumptions about how HLDPs support leaders to affect change within complex systems.

Keywords: Evaluation; Health care; Leadership; Management development; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahrari, A., Abbas, A., Bhayana, R., Harris, A. and Probyn, L. (2021), “Leadership development programs for radiology residents: a literature review”, Canadian Association of Radiologists’ Journal, Vol. 72 No. 4, pp. 669-677, available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0846537120986495 (accessed 9 November 2021).
    1. Arksey, H. and O’Malley, L. (2005), “Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 19-32, doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
    1. Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B. and Quisenberry, D. (2010), “Estimating return on leadership development investment”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 633-644, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.006.
    1. Bekas, S. (2015), “Leadership development in UK medical training: pedagogical theory and practice”, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 4-11, doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.979177.
    1. Blumenthal, D.M., Bernard, K., Bohnen, J. and Bohmer, R. (2012), “Addressing the leadership gap in medicine: residents’ need for systematic leadership development training”, Academic Medicine, Vol. 87 No. 4, pp. 513-522, doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824a0c47.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources