Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 13;4(4):100296.
doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100296. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Multi-group invariance testing of the knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement scale

Affiliations

Multi-group invariance testing of the knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement scale

Caleb Allred et al. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) scale is commonly used to assess patient progress. Scale structural validity has not been completely assessed. The purpose of this study was to assess the internal consistency, structural validity, and multi-group invariance properties of the KOOS-JR in a large sample of patients receiving knee arthroplasty or non-operative care.

Methods: A cross-sectional study using the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) database. Patients receiving care for degenerative knee conditions were included in the study. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to confirm scale structure of the KOOS-JR using a priori cut-off values (Comparative Fit Index [CFI], Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI], Incremental Fit Index [IFI] ​≥ ​0.95, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] ​≤ ​0.06 preferred and ≤0.08 acceptable). Multigroup invariance testing was conducted across sex, age, and intervention groups.

Results: Internal consistency was acceptable (alpha ​= ​0.83; omega ​= ​0.83). The unidimensional structure of the KOOS-JR exceeded most contemporary model fit recommendations (CFI ​= ​0.976, TLI ​= ​0.964, IFI ​= ​0.976, RMSEA ​= ​0.067). The KOOS-JR was invariant across groups, allowing for comparison of variances and means between sex, age, and intervention groups.

Conclusion: The KOOS-JR met or exceeded most of the recommendations for model fit. The scale can be used to assess differences between males and females, middle and older aged adults, and between baseline measures of patients who received total knee arthroplasty or non-operative care.

Keywords: Knee pathology; Psychometric analysis; Structural validity; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Measurement Model with Standardized Loadings. CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI ​= ​Tucker-Lewis Index; IFI = Bollen's Incremental Fit Index; RMSEA ​= ​Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, df ​= ​degrees of freedom. Each circle represents an unobserved variable, and each rectangle represents an observed variable. The unobserved variables to the right of each rectangle observed variable (e.g., e1, e2, e3, etc.) represent variance not explained by the factor that the indicator variable was intended to measure. The numbers along the lines from the KOOS-JR latent unobserved variable to each observed variable (e.g., Pre_1, Pre_2, etc.) are standardized regression weights. The numbers on the top right of each rectangle observed variable (e.g., Pre_1, Pre_2, etc.) are squared multiple correlations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chin R., Lee B.Y. Elsevier Inc; London, UK: 2008. Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine.
    1. Cano S., Pendrill L., Melin J., Fisher W., Jr. Towards consensus measurement standards for patient-centered outcomes. Measurement. 2019;141:62–69.
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Crossing The Quality Chasm-A New Health System For the 21stCentury. first ed. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2001. Committee on quality of health care in America. - PubMed
    1. Ware J.E., Jr., Snyder M.K., Wright W.R., Davies A.R. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval. Progr. Plann. 1983;6(3–4):247–263. - PubMed
    1. Farnsworth J.L., II, Evans T., Binkley H., Kang M. Evaluation of knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures using Rasch analysis. J. Sport Rehabil. 2020;30(2):278–285. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources