Multi-group invariance testing of the knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement scale
- PMID: 36474795
- PMCID: PMC9718163
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100296
Multi-group invariance testing of the knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement scale
Abstract
Objective: The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) scale is commonly used to assess patient progress. Scale structural validity has not been completely assessed. The purpose of this study was to assess the internal consistency, structural validity, and multi-group invariance properties of the KOOS-JR in a large sample of patients receiving knee arthroplasty or non-operative care.
Methods: A cross-sectional study using the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) database. Patients receiving care for degenerative knee conditions were included in the study. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to confirm scale structure of the KOOS-JR using a priori cut-off values (Comparative Fit Index [CFI], Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI], Incremental Fit Index [IFI] ≥ 0.95, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] ≤ 0.06 preferred and ≤0.08 acceptable). Multigroup invariance testing was conducted across sex, age, and intervention groups.
Results: Internal consistency was acceptable (alpha = 0.83; omega = 0.83). The unidimensional structure of the KOOS-JR exceeded most contemporary model fit recommendations (CFI = 0.976, TLI = 0.964, IFI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.067). The KOOS-JR was invariant across groups, allowing for comparison of variances and means between sex, age, and intervention groups.
Conclusion: The KOOS-JR met or exceeded most of the recommendations for model fit. The scale can be used to assess differences between males and females, middle and older aged adults, and between baseline measures of patients who received total knee arthroplasty or non-operative care.
Keywords: Knee pathology; Psychometric analysis; Structural validity; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2022 The Authors.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Longitudinal Invariance Testing Of The Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score For Joint Replacement Scale (KOOS-JR).Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 1;18(5):1094-1105. doi: 10.26603/001c.86129. eCollection 2023. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023. PMID: 37795315 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Structural Validity of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Scale.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;12(4):414. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040414. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38391790 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR).Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024 Jan 11;6(1):100435. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100435. eCollection 2024 Mar. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024. PMID: 38299019 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric evaluation of the NoMAD instrument in cancer care settings: assessing factorial validity, measurement invariance, and differential item functioning.Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jun 16;6(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00756-3. Implement Sci Commun. 2025. PMID: 40524282 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS).Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Dec;28(12):1525-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 19. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020. PMID: 32827668
Cited by
-
Longitudinal Invariance Testing Of The Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score For Joint Replacement Scale (KOOS-JR).Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 1;18(5):1094-1105. doi: 10.26603/001c.86129. eCollection 2023. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023. PMID: 37795315 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Structural Validity of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Scale.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;12(4):414. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040414. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38391790 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chin R., Lee B.Y. Elsevier Inc; London, UK: 2008. Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine.
-
- Cano S., Pendrill L., Melin J., Fisher W., Jr. Towards consensus measurement standards for patient-centered outcomes. Measurement. 2019;141:62–69.
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Crossing The Quality Chasm-A New Health System For the 21stCentury. first ed. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2001. Committee on quality of health care in America. - PubMed
-
- Ware J.E., Jr., Snyder M.K., Wright W.R., Davies A.R. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval. Progr. Plann. 1983;6(3–4):247–263. - PubMed
-
- Farnsworth J.L., II, Evans T., Binkley H., Kang M. Evaluation of knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures using Rasch analysis. J. Sport Rehabil. 2020;30(2):278–285. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous