Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 7;113(6):e2022057.
doi: 10.23749/mdl.v113i6.13652.

A method for the risk assessment of biomechanical overload in hospital physiotherapists

Affiliations

A method for the risk assessment of biomechanical overload in hospital physiotherapists

Emma Sala et al. Med Lav. .

Abstract

Background: In physiotherapists, biomechanical overload risk assessment (RA) is particularly complex due to the tasks' variability. The present study aims to propose a new methodology, named Whole Body RA Biomechanical Overload (WB-RAMBO), to assess the risk in the activities performed by physiotherapists.

Methods: Each type of intervention was broken down into elementary operations. The risk factors (force, repetitiveness, and incongruous postures) were recorded and evaluated for each of these. For each task, the risk level was obtained by integrating the results of multiple ergonomic methods among those proposed by the international literature. To verify and validate the obtained results, we reviewed the medical records of health surveillance carried out on physiotherapists.

Results: From the ergonomic point of view, RA shows a situation of acceptability. The observed slight dysergonomies are diluted in the work shift and allow an optimal functional recovery of the musculoskeletal system.

Conclusions: This method proposes a RA for each operation performed. A work plan subjected to such a peculiar RA can be redesigned and adapted to the company's and the hypersusceptible worker's organizational needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diagram of the calculation performed to define the risk.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
MSDs distribution in physiotherapists from 2016 to 2021.

Similar articles

References

    1. Rozenfeld V, Ribak J, Danziger J, Tsamir J, Carmeli E. Prevalence, risk factors and preventive strategies in work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Israeli physical therapists. Physiother Res Int. 2010;15(3):176–184. Doi:10.1002/pri.440. - PubMed
    1. Grooten WJ, Wernstedt P, Campo M. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in female Swedish physical therapists with more than 15 years of job experience: prevalence and associations with work exposures. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;27(3):213–222. Doi:10.3109/09593985.2010.481323. - PubMed
    1. Petracca M, Bongiorni M, Bartoletti R, Villa L, Candura SM. Movimentazione manuale, idoneità alla mansione e disturbi muscolo-scheletrici negli operatori sanitari dell’Ospedale di Sondrio [Manual handling, job fitness, and musculoskeletal disorders in the Sondrio hospital (Italy) healthcare workers.] G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2018;40(4):203–207. - PubMed
    1. Lupi A, Martinelli R, Tobia L, Paoletti A. Valutazione del rischio da sovraccarico biomeccanico dell’art superiore nei tecnici di fisiokinesiterapia [Evaluation of risks of biomechanical overload of the upper limb in physical kinesis therapists] G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2005;27(2):235–236. - PubMed
    1. Gerbaudo L, Violante B. Correlazione tra disturbi muscolo-scheletrici e posture disergonomiche in un gruppo di operatori sanitari di un’azienda ospedaliera [Relationship between musculoskeletal disorders and work-related awkward postures among a group of health care workers in a hospital] Med Lav. 2008;99(1):29–39. - PubMed