Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan-Dec:21:15330338221142160.
doi: 10.1177/15330338221142160.

Application and Development of Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases

Affiliations
Review

Application and Development of Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases

Lu Hao et al. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

With the improvement of medical technology, the quality of life and prognosis of patients with malignant tumors have been greatly improved, and surgical treatment strategies for patients with spinal metastatic tumors have received extensive attention. Traditional open surgery for spinal metastases has problems such as large trauma, slow recovery, and influence on subsequent systemic treatment. Minimally invasive spine surgery has similar clinical outcomes to traditional open surgery, but minimally invasive spine surgery is less invasive and has a shorter recovery time. Minimally invasive spine surgery was initially applied to non-neoplastic diseases such as spinal degeneration and trauma, and was gradually applied to the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors and spinal deformities. For patients with spinal metastases, a shorter recovery time is helpful for early postoperative radiotherapy, thereby achieving a more satisfactory tumor control effect. This review discusses the application of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors from the concept, surgical purpose, indications, and surgical selection, so as to provide reference for clinical practice.

Keywords: decompression; internal fixation; minimally invasive; percutaneous vertebroplasty; spinal metastases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Strategies for selecting minimally invasive spinal surgery for spinal metastatic tumors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galgano M, Fridley J, Oyelese A, et al. Surgical management of spinal metastases. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(5):463-472. - PubMed
    1. Barzilai O, Fisher CG, Bilsky MH. State of the art treatment of spinal metastatic disease. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(6):757-769. - PubMed
    1. Gasbarrini A, Li H, Cappuccio M, et al. Efficacy evaluation of a new treatment algorithm for spinal metastases. Spine. 2010;35(15):1466-1470. - PubMed
    1. Quraishi NA, Gokaslan ZL, Boriani S. The surgical management of metastatic epidural compression of the spinal cord. J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol. 2010;92(8):1054-1060. - PubMed
    1. Donnelly DJ, Abd-El-Barr MM, Lu Y. Minimally invasive muscle sparing posterior-only approach for lumbar circumferential decompression and stabilization to treat spine metastasis–technical report. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(5):1484-1490. - PubMed