Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 1;134(1):142-146.
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00491.2022. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

Differences in respiratory oscillometry measurements using mouthpiece, mouth, and nasal mask in healthy adults

Affiliations
Free article

Differences in respiratory oscillometry measurements using mouthpiece, mouth, and nasal mask in healthy adults

Malak Alshlowi et al. J Appl Physiol (1985). .
Free article

Abstract

Airway resistance measurements using oscillometry provide a potential alternative to spirometry in assessing airway obstruction and dynamics due to measurements taken during tidal breathing. Oscillometry typically requires participants to form a tight seal around a mouthpiece that can prove challenging for some people. To address this challenge, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate the effect of different interfaces like mouthpiece, mouth mask, and nasal mask on respiratory impedance results from oscillometry in a cohort of healthy adults. Ten healthy adults [7 females; mean age: 38.9 yr (SD ±15.5)] underwent oscillometry using each of the three interfaces. We measured resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5), frequency dependence of resistance at 5-20 Hz (Rrs5-20), and reactance area (Ax). Rrs5 was not different when using the mouthpiece compared with the mouth mask [mean 2.98 cmH2O/L/s (SD ±0.68) vs. mean 3.2 cmH2O/L/s (SD ±0.81); P = 0.92; 95% CI -0.82 to +0.38], respectively. Nasal mask Rrs5 measurements were significantly higher than mouthpiece measurements (mean 7.31 cmH2O/L/s; SD ±2.62; P < 0.01; 95%CI -6.91 to -1.75). With Ax5, we found a mean of 4.01 cmH2O/L (SD ±2.04) with the mouth mask compared with a mean of 4.02 cmH2O/L (SD ±1.87; P = 1.0 95% CI -1.86 to +1.87) for the mouthpiece, however, we found a significant difference between the mouthpiece and nasal mask for Ax (mean = 10.71; SD ±7.0 H2O/L; P = 0.04, 95% CI -12.96 to -0.43). Our findings show that oscillometry using a mouth mask may be just as effective as using a mouthpiece in assessing airway dynamics and resistance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to compare the use of different interfaces: mouthpiece, mouth mask, and nasal mask, for oscillometry in an adult population. We report that using a mouth mask in oscillometry may provide a valid alternative to a mouthpiece in cohorts who may struggle to form the required tight seal that is typically required in oscillometry or spirometry.

Keywords: airway resistance; asthma; lung function; wheeze.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources