Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 1;80(2):156-166.
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.4109.

Association of In Utero Antipsychotic Medication Exposure With Risk of Congenital Malformations in Nordic Countries and the US

Affiliations

Association of In Utero Antipsychotic Medication Exposure With Risk of Congenital Malformations in Nordic Countries and the US

Krista F Huybrechts et al. JAMA Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Importance: Psychiatric disorders are common among female individuals of reproductive age. While antipsychotic medication use is increasing, the safety of such medications in pregnancy is an area with large evidence gaps.

Objective: To evaluate the risk of first-trimester antipsychotic exposure with respect to congenital malformations, focusing on individual drugs and specific malformation subtypes.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used data from nationwide health registers from the 5 Nordic countries and the US and spanned 1996 to 2018. The Nordic cohort included all pregnancies resulting in singleton live-born infants, and the US cohort consisted of publicly insured mothers linked to their live-born infants nested in the nationwide Medicaid Analytic eXtract. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to April 2022.

Exposures: One or more first-trimester dispensing of any atypical, any typical, and individual antipsychotic drugs.

Main outcomes and measures: Any major congenital malformation and specific malformation subtypes previously suggested to be associated with antipsychotic exposure in utero: cardiovascular malformations, oral clefts, neural tube defects, hip dysplasia, limb reduction defects, anorectal atresia/stenosis, gastroschisis, hydrocephalus, other specific brain anomalies, and esophageal disorders. Propensity score stratification was used to control for potential confounders. Pooled adjusted estimates were calculated using indirect standardization.

Results: A total of 6 455 324 unexposed mothers (mean maternal age range across countries: 24-31 years), 21 751 mothers exposed to atypical antipsychotic drugs (mean age range, 26-31 years), and 6371 mothers exposed to typical antipsychotic drugs (mean age range, 27-32 years) were included in the study cohort. Prevalence of any major malformation was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.7%-2.8%) in unexposed infants, 4.3% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.6%) in infants with atypical antipsychotic drug exposure, and 3.1% (95% CI, 2.7%-3.5%) in infants with typical antipsychotic drug exposure in utero. Among the most prevalent exposure-outcome combinations, adjusted relative risks (aRR) were generally close to the null. One exception was olanzapine exposure and oral cleft (aRR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1-4.3]); however, estimates varied across sensitivity analyses. Among moderately prevalent combinations, increased risks were observed for gastroschisis and other specific brain anomalies after atypical antipsychotic exposure (aRR, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.8-2.6] and 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-3.0]) and for cardiac malformations after chlorprothixene exposure (aRR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.0-2.7]). While the association direction was consistent across sensitivity analyses, confidence intervals were wide, prohibiting firm conclusions.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, considering the evidence from primary and sensitivity analyses and inevitable statistical noise for very rare exposure-outcome combinations, in utero antipsychotic exposure generally was not meaningfully associated with an increased risk of malformations. The observed increased risks of oral clefts associated with olanzapine, gastroschisis, and other specific brain anomalies with atypical antipsychotics and cardiac malformations with chlorprothixene requires confirmation as evidence continues to accumulate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Huybrechts reported grants from National Institute of Mental Health and grants from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development during the conduct of the study and grants from UCB and Takeda to Brigham and Women's Hospital outside the submitted work. Drs Cesta, Kieler, Karlsson, Pazzagli, and Reutfors are employees at the Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, which receives grants from several entities (pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities, and contract research organizations) for the performance of drug safety and drug utilization studies, unrelated to this work. Dr Furu reported grants from Research Council of Norway (project 273366) and Nordforsk (Nordic Research Council) (project 83539) during the conduct of the study. Dr Hernandez-Diaz reported grants from National Institute of Child Health and Human Development during the conduct of the study; grants from Takeda (to their institution) and UCB outside the submitted work; personal fees from UCB and Roche outside the submitted work; and is a member of scientific advisory committee for the Antipsychotics Pregnancy Registry, funded by multiple companies. Dr Zoega reported grants from AbbVie Australia to their institution outside the submitted work and was supported by a UNSW Scientia Program Award during the conduct of this study. Dr Bateman is an investigator on grants to his institution from Pacira and UCB and is a consultant to Aetion Inc and the Alosa Foundation. Dr Cesta was supported by funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 844728. Dr Cohen reported grants from Research Council of Norway (project 273366) and Nordforsk (Nordic Research Council) (project 83539) during the conduct of the study. Drs Gissler and Leinonen report grants from Finnish Medicines Agency (Fimea) to their institution and Innovative Medicines Initiative during the conduct of this study. Dr Selmer reported grants from Research Council of Norway Project 273366 and grants from Nordforsk (Nordic Research Council) Project 83539 during the conduct of the study. Dr Kieler reports grants from the IMI ConcePTION during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cohort Creation and Antipsychotic Drug Exposure During the First Trimester of Pregnancies in the Nordic Databases and the US Medicaid Analytic eXtract
aRestriction to singleton births was only applied within the Nordic cohorts. In the US data, multiples remained in the study cohort, with multiple gestation being included as a covariate in the propensity score. NA indicates not available (numbers suppressed due to country-/data-specific suppression policy).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Standardized Differences of Pregnancies With Atypical or Typical Antipsychotic (AP) Exposure vs No AP Exposure During the First Trimester (Unadjusted and Propensity Score Weighted)
Not all standardized differences for each covariate and country shown due to small cell size suppression policy. aOther/unknown: American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Hispanic or Latino and ≥1 races, >1 race, and unknown. Hispanic: Hispanic or Latino with no race information available. Other/unknown: Hispanic or Latino with ≥1 races. bOther psychoactive drugs include benzodiazepines, barbiturates, anxiolytics, and other hypnotics. cEstimated as (Xexp-Xref)/√((sexp2+sref2)/2). X represents the sample mean and s2 the sample variance of the covariate in the AP exposed and reference group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Pooled Absolute Risk With 95% CIs of Major Malformations Overall Among Live-born Infants With and Without Antipsychotic Exposure in Utero
Prevalence of major congenital malformations among ziprasidone-, zuclopenthixol-, and clozapine-exposed pregnancies is not presented because the number of cases had to be suppressed due to country-/data-specific small cell suppression policies. Prevalence of major congenital malformations among pimozide- and sertindole-exposed pregnancies was zero and is therefore not shown.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Pooled Unadjusted Relative Risk and Propensity Score—Weighted Standardized Morbidity Ratio (SMR), Separately for Each Exposure-Outcome Contrast, Sorted by Prevalence of Exposure and Outcome in the Nordic and US Cohorts
Rows are sorted by the most common to least common antipsychotic exposures and columns are sorted by the most common to least common outcomes among the unexposed. The outcome order was determined based on the absolute risk among the unexposed as observed in the US cohort (absolute risk for Nordic cohorts was not available for some outcomes due to country-specific cell suppression policies). Drugs in red belong to the atypical antipsychotic class and drugs in black to the typical antipsychotic class. The blue dotted line connects antipsychotic drugs with ≥100 exposed individuals and malformations with a prevalence of ≥0.5 per 1000 infants among the unexposed (as observed in the US cohort). The orange dashed line connects the least frequent antipsychotic with the least frequent malformation. Cells containing zeros are those with no outcomes of interest among the exposed.

References

    1. Farr SL, Bitsko RH, Hayes DK, Dietz PM. Mental health and access to services among US women of reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(6):542.e1-9. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ko JY, Farr SL, Dietz PM, Robbins CL. Depression and treatment among U.S. pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age, 2005-2009. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(8):830-836. doi:10.1089/jwh.2011.3466 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Hara MW. Postpartum depression: what we know. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65(12):1258-1269. doi:10.1002/jclp.20644 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edinoff AN, Sathivadivel N, McNeil SE, et al. . Antipsychotic use in pregnancy: patient mental health challenges, teratogenicity, pregnancy complications, and postnatal risks. Neurol Int. 2022;14(1):62-74. doi:10.3390/neurolint14010005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nemeroff CB. Use of atypical antipsychotics in refractory depression and anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66(suppl 8):13-21. - PubMed

Publication types