Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov-Dec;33(6):86-93.
doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202204870.

Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using different adhesive systems and directions of electric current

[Article in Portuguese]
Maurício Bottene Guarda  1 , Rafael Rocha Pacheco  2 , Isaias Donizeti Silva  3 , William Cunha Brandt  3 , Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti  1 , Rafael Pino Vitti  4
Affiliations

Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using different adhesive systems and directions of electric current

[Article in Portuguese]
Maurício Bottene Guarda et al. Braz Dent J. 2022 Nov-Dec.

Abstract
in English, Portuguese

Thisstudy aimed to evaluate the effect of the electric current direction application on the resin composite-dentin bond strength using three adhesive systems. Human molar teeth were distributed according to the adhesive system (two-step self-etch - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; one-step self-etch - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; and two-step etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), electric current direction (without electric current - control, direct and reverse electric currents - 35µA), and storage time (24h - immediate and 6 months). Resin composite blocks (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) were bonded to dentin. The teeth/resin composites specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 hours and 6 months for the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test (n = 10; ~12 sticks for each tooth). Failure patterns were analyzed on a stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-dentin, cohesive-resin, adhesive or mixed. Adhesive penetration into dentin and hybrid layer formation were evaluated in a scanning electron microscope (n = 6). Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). There are no differences in µTBS when the adhesive systems were applied under direct and reverse electric currents, but both electric currents increased the µTBS for all adhesive systems. SBU showed the lowest µTBS values for control groups in both storage times and direct electric current in 6 months of storage. The adhesive failure pattern was more frequently observed in all groups. The electric current formed long resin tags for all adhesive systems. Storage for 6 months did not significantly decrease µTBS values. Both directions of electric current (positive and negative charges) at 35µA can increase the µTBS of the adhesive systems tested to dentin.

O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da direção da corrente elétrica na resistência da união resina composta-dentina usando três sistemas adesivos. Dentes molares humanos foram distribuídos de acordo com o sistema adesivo (dois passos autocondicionante - Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray [CSE]; e um passo autocondicionante - Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE [SBU]; e dois passos convencional - Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE [SB2]), a direção da corrente elétrica (sem corrente elétrica - controle, correntes elétricas direta e reversa - 35µA) e tempo de armazenamento (24h - imediato e 6 meses). Blocos de resina composta (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) foram aderidos à dentina. Amostras de dentina-resina foram produzidas e armazenadas em água destilada a 37ºC por 24 horas e 6 meses para o teste de resistência da união à microtração (µTBS) (n = 10; ~12 palitos por dente). Os padrões de fratura foram analisados ​​em estereomicroscópio e classificados em falhas coesiva na dentina, coesiva na resina, adesiva ou mista. A penetração do adesivo na dentina e a formação da camada híbrida foram avaliadas em microscópio eletrônico de varredura (MEV). Os dados foram submetidos à ANOVA três fatores seguidos pelo teste post hoc de Tukey (α = 0,05). Não houve diferenças na µTBS quando os sistemas adesivos foram aplicados sob as correntes elétricas direta e reversa, mas ambas as correntes elétricas aumentaram a µTBS para todos os sistemas adesivos. SBU apresentou os menores valores de µTBS para o grupo controle em ambos os tempos de armazenamento e para a corrente elétrica direta em 6 meses de armazenamento. Falhas adesivas foram mais frequente em todos os grupos. A corrente elétrica formou longos tags resinosos para todos os sistemas adesivos. O armazenamento por 6 meses não diminuiu significativamente os valores de µTBS. Ambos os sentidos da corrente elétrica (cargas positivas e negativas) a 35µA podem aumentar a µTBS dos sistemas adesivos testados à dentina.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mackenzie L, Banerjee A. Minimally invasive direct restorations: a practical guide. Br Dent J. 2017;223:163–171. - PubMed
    1. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118–132. - PubMed
    1. Stape THS, Seseogullari-Dirihan R, Tjäderhane L, Abuna G, Martins LRM, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. A novel dry-bonding approach to reduce collagen degradation and optimize resin-dentin interfaces. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16890–16890. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Betancourt DE, Baldion PA, Castellanos JE. Resin-dentin bonding interface: mechanisms of degradation and strategies for stabilization of the hybrid layer. Int J Biomater. 2019 2019. 5268342. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Navarra CO, Cadenaro M, Codan B, Mazzoni A, Sergo V, Dorigo EDS, et al. Degree of conversion and interfacial nanoleakage expression of three one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:463–469. - PubMed

Publication types