Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 28:2022:3938492.
doi: 10.1155/2022/3938492. eCollection 2022.

Mortality prediction in ICU Using a Stacked Ensemble Model

Affiliations

Mortality prediction in ICU Using a Stacked Ensemble Model

Na Ren et al. Comput Math Methods Med. .

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has huge scope in developing models to predict the survival rate of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). The availability of electronic clinical data has led to the widespread use of various machine learning approaches in this field. Innovative algorithms play a crucial role in boosting the performance of models. This study uses a stacked ensemble model to predict mortality in ICU by incorporating the clinical severity scoring results, in which several machine learning algorithms are employed to compare the performance. The experimental results show that the stacked ensemble model achieves good performance compared with the model without integrating the severity scoring results, which has the area under curve (AUC) of 0.879 and 0.862, respectively. To improve the performance of prediction, two feature subsets are obtained based on different feature selection techniques, labeled as SetS and SetT. Evaluation performances show that the SEM based on the SetS achieves a higher AUC value (0.879 and 0.860). Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis is employed to interpret the correlation between the risk features and the outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The framework of stacked ensemble model. In Figure 1(a), five groups of predictions based on 5-fold cross validation are used as the new training set. In Figure 1(b), logistic regression is used for modeling the new training set.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The framework of features and approaches in the experiment. The blue rectangle icons represent feature sets, and the orange ellipse icons represent approaches.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Model performance on test data. (a) Compared with three models, the proposed SEM is superior to others, which has the AUC of 0.879 and 95% CI (0.842,0.883). (b) The performance of SEM based on SetS achieves better prediction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The rank of feature importance based on the SHAP contribution values. Figure 4 shows the top 10 important features based on the Shapely contribution values. The feature AHDP and AIDP have a strong relationship with the mortality rate.
Figure 5
Figure 5
SHAP interaction analysis plots of the selected features. Abbreviation: ap3diag: apache_3j_diagnosis. (a) The interaction analysis for age and its corresponding SHAP value. (b) The interaction analysis for ap3diag and its corresponding SHAP value. (c) The interaction analysis for d1_bun_min and its corresponding SHAP value. (d) The interaction analysis for gcs_motor_apache and its corresponding SHAP value. (e) The interaction analysis for d1_heartrate_min and its corresponding SHAP value. (f) The interaction analysis for d1_spo2_min and its corresponding SHAP value.
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 1
APACHE score-based model using stacked ensemble technique.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang B., Ding S., Liu X., Li X., Li G. Predictive classification of ICU readmission using weight decay random forest. Future Generation Computer Systems . 2021;124:351–360. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.06.011. - DOI
    1. Dasta J. F., McLaughlin T. P., Mody S. H., Piech C. T. Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution of mechanical ventilation. Critical Care Medicine . 2005;33(6):1266–1271. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000164543.14619.00. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kramer A. A., Dasta J. F., Kane-Gill S. L. The impact of mortality on total costs within the ICU. Critical Care Medicine . 2017;45(9):1457–1463. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002563. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knaus W. A., Wagner D. P., Draper E. A., et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically III hospitalized adults. Chest . 1991;100(6):1619–1636. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.6.1619. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim S. H., Chan C. W., Olivares M., Escobar G. ICU admission control: an empirical study of capacity allocation and its implication for patient outcomes. Management Science . 2015;61(1):19–38. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2057. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources