A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence
- PMID: 36479570
- PMCID: PMC9719928
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.971762
A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence
Abstract
Since the first groundbreaking procedure in 2002, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the management of aortic stenosis (AS). Through striking developments in pertinent equipment and techniques, TAVI has now become the leading therapeutic strategy for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe symptomatic AS. The procedure streamlining from routine use of conscious sedation to a single arterial access approach, the newly adapted implantation techniques, and the introduction of novel technologies such as intravascular lithotripsy and the refinement of valve-bioprosthesis devices along with the accumulating experience have resulted in a dramatic reduction of complications and have improved associated outcomes that are now considered comparable or even superior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). These advances have opened the road to the use of TAVI in younger and lower-risk patients and up-to-date data from landmark studies have now established the outstanding efficacy and safety of TAVI in patients with low-surgical risk impelling the most recent ESC guidelines to propose TAVI, as the main therapeutic strategy for patients with AS aged 75 years or older. In this article, we aim to summarize the most recent advances and the current clinical aspects involving the use of TAVI, and we also attempt to highlight impending concerns that need to be further addressed.
Keywords: TAVI; TAVR; aortic stenosis (AS); aortic valve calcification; bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve; minimalistic approach; paravalvular aortic leak.
Copyright © 2022 Kalogeropoulos, Redwood, Allen, Hurrell, Chehab, Rajani, Prendergast and Patterson.
Conflict of interest statement
Author SR received speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences and served as an International Advisory Board Member for Medtronic. Author BP received institutional educational and research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, and speaker/consultancy fees from Abbott, Anteris, Microport, and Edwards Lifesciences. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures







References
-
- Francone M, Budde RPJ, Bremerich J, Dacher JN, Loewe C, Wolf F, et al. CT and MR imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: standardisation of scanning protocols, measurements and reporting-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). Eur Radiol. (2020) 30:2627–50. - PMC - PubMed
-
- El Faquir N, De Backer O, Bosmans J, Rudolph T, Buzzatti N, Bieliauskas G, et al. Patient-specific computer simulation in TAVR with the self-expanding evolut R valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2020) 13:1803–12. - PubMed
-
- Oguri A, Yamamoto M, Mouillet G, Gilard M, Laskar M, Eltchaninoff H, et al. Clinical outcomes and safety of transfemoral aortic valve implantation under general versus local anesthesia: subanalysis of the French aortic national corevalve and edwards 2 registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2014) 7:602–10. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000403 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hyman MC, Vemulapalli S, Szeto WY, Stebbins A, Patel PA, Matsouaka RA, et al. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the national cardiovascular data registry society of thoracic surgeons/American college of cardiology transcatheter valve therapy registry. Circulation. (2017) 136:2132–40. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials