Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb;15(2):379-399.
doi: 10.1111/os.13392. Epub 2022 Dec 7.

Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of 50 Randomized Controlled Trials

Xiumei Tang  1 , Yue He  1 , Shi Pu  2 , Lei Lei  1 , Ning Ning  1 , Yu Shi  2 , Jiali Chen  1 , Zongke Zhou  3
Affiliations
Review

Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of 50 Randomized Controlled Trials

Xiumei Tang et al. Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: During total knee arthroplasty, femur and tibia parts are regularly replaced, while resurfacing the patellar or not is an ongoing discussion. To compare revision rate, anterior knee pain rate, patient-reported outcome measures, complication, radiographic, and clinical outcomes after patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were searched on 25 April 2021 to enroll randomized controlled trials that compared patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing. We used the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcome was revision rate and secondary outcomes was anterior knee pain rate. Outcomes were pooled using the random-effect model and presented as risk ratio (RR), or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Fifty studies (5586 knees) were included. Significant reductions in patellar revision rate (RR 0.41, 95% CI [0.19, 0.88]; P = 0.02; I2 = 24.20%) and non-patellar revision rate (RR 0.64, 95% CI [0.55, 0.75]; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) were seen after patellar resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing significantly reduced the anterior knee pain rate than nonresurfacing (RR 0.72, 95% CI [0.57, 0.91]; P = 0.006; I2 = 69.5%). Significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures were found. However, these differences were inconsistent and lacked clinical importance. Patellar resurfacing resulted in a significant lower rate of patellar clunk (RR 0.58, 95% CI [0.38, 0.88]; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%), a higher patellar score (MD 1.24, 95% CI [0.67, 0.81]; P < 0.001; I2 = 73.8%), but prolonged surgical time (MD 8.59, 95% CI [5.27, 11.91]; P < 0.001; I2 = 88.8%).

Conclusions: The clear relationship is that patellar resurfacing reduces revisions, anterior knee pain, and patellar clunk. It will be interesting to compare the initial cost with the revision cost when required and cost-utility analysis with long-term results in future studies.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Patellar resurfacing; Randomized controlled trials; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram representing search and selection of studies comparing patellar resurfacing versus patellar non‐resurfacing of TKA
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of patellar resurfacing on revision in included trials. (A) Forest plot of revision in RCTs. (B) Trial sequential analysis of revision in RCTs (adjusted boundaries print). (C) Trial sequential analysis of revision in RCTs (penalized test print)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of patellar resurfacing on KSS clinical component in included trials. (A) Forest plot of KSS clinical component in RCTs. (B) Trial sequential analysis of KSS clinical component in RCTs (adjusted boundaries print). (C) Trial sequential analysis of KSS clinical component in RCTs (penalized test print)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of the functional component of KSS in the meta‐analysis comparing patellar resurfacing versus patellar non‐resurfacing of TKA
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effect of patellar non‐resurfacing on anterior knee pain in included trials. A. Forest plot of anterior knee pain in RCTs. B. Trial sequential analysis of anterior knee pain in RCTs (adjusted boundaries print). C. Trial sequential analysis of anterior knee pain in RCTs (penalized test print)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Funnel plots
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Allen W, Eichinger J, Friedman R. Resurfaced versus non‐resurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(7):611–5. - PubMed
    1. NG157, N.g. , Joint replacement (primary): hip, knee and shoulder [L] Evidence review for patella resurfacing . Intervention evidence review underpinning recommendation 1.7.2 and the research recommendation in the NICE guideline, 2020.
    1. Chen K, Dai X, Li L, Chen Z, Cui H, Lv S. Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hou C, Chu X, Zhang B, Li J, Dong Y, Zhao Y. Patellar resurfacing versus patellar nonresurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(21):e20097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teel AJ, Esposito JG, Lanting BA, Howard JL, Schemitsch EH. Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(12):3124–32. - PubMed