Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 8;17(12):e0277100.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277100. eCollection 2022.

Can North American animal poison control center call data provide early warning of outbreaks associated with contaminated pet food? Using the 2007 melamine pet food contamination incident as a case study

Affiliations

Can North American animal poison control center call data provide early warning of outbreaks associated with contaminated pet food? Using the 2007 melamine pet food contamination incident as a case study

Alexandra L Swirski et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The 2007 melamine pet food contamination incident highlighted the need for enhanced reporting of toxicological exposures and development of a national quantitative disease surveillance system for companion animals. Data from poison control centers, such as the Animal Poison Control Center (APCC), may be useful for conducting real-time surveillance in this population. In this study, we explored the suitability of APCC call data for early warning of toxicological incidents in companion animal populations by using a-priori knowledge of the melamine-related nephrotoxicosis outbreak. Patient and household-level information regarding possible toxicological exposures in dogs and cats reported to the APCC from 2005 to 2007, inclusive, were extracted from the APCC's AnTox database. These data were used to examine the impact of surveillance outcome, statistical methodology, analysis level, and call source on the ability to detect the outbreak prior to the voluntary recall issued by the pet food manufacturer. Retrospective Poisson temporal scan tests were applied for each combination of outcome, method, level, and call source. The results showed that month-adjusted scans using syndromic data may have been able to help detect the outbreak up to two months prior to the voluntary recall although the success of these methods varied across call sources. We also demonstrated covariate month-adjustment can lead to vastly different results based on the surveillance outcome and call source to which it is applied. This illustrates care should be taken prior to arbitrarily selecting a surveillance outcome and statistical model for surveillance efforts and warns against ignoring the impacts of call source or key covariates when applying quantitative surveillance methods to APCC call data since these factors can lead to very different results. This study provides further evidence that APCC call data may be useful for conducting surveillance in the US companion animal population and further exploratory analyses and validation studies are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. A timeline of the 2007 melamine pet food contamination outbreak in North America.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Flow chart of the 12 scans conducted for each outcome measure and combination of surveillance outcome, statistical methodology, data aggregation level and call source.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Number of dogs and cats exposed to pet food products, by call source, as reported to the APCC during toxicological consult calls from 2005 to 2007, inclusive.
(A) Number of dogs. (B) Number of cats.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Number of dogs and cats with urinary and renal failure syndromes reported to the APCC during a toxicological consult call from 2005 to 2007, inclusive, stratified by call source.
(A) Number of dogs. (B) Number of cats.

Similar articles

References

    1. Choi J, Cho Y, Shim E, Woo H. Web-based infectious disease surveillance systems and public health perspectives: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1). doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3893-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simonsen L, Gog JR, Olson D, Viboud C. Infectious disease surveillance in the big data era: Towards faster and locally relevant systems. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(Suppl 4):S380–5. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw376 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willis S, Cocoros N, Randall L, Ochoa A, Haney G, Hsu K, et al.. Electronic health record use in public health infectious disease surveillance, USA, 2018–2019. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019;21(10):32. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0694-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dórea FC, Sanchez J, Revie CW. Veterinary syndromic surveillance: Current initiatives and potential for development. Prev Vet Med. 2011;101:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dórea FC, Vial F. Animal health syndromic surveillance: a systematic literature review of the progress in the last 5 years (2011–2016). Vet Med Res Reports. 2016;Volume 7:157–70. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types