A Comparative Review of the Outcome Following MVD and PBC in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia
- PMID: 36482002
- DOI: 10.1055/a-1994-7956
A Comparative Review of the Outcome Following MVD and PBC in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia
Abstract
Background: This study aims to systematically review the treatment outcomes of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) and microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.
Methods: A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials databases. Only those articles with more than 5 years' follow-up length were included in this investigation. To uniformly assess the postoperative outcome, we defined pain relief as totally pain free, while the postoperative hospitalization and last follow-up period were defined as early and long term, respectively. The facial numbness was quantified with Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (BNI).
Results: After database searching and screening, 7,797 cases were finally included according to the criteria. The early pain relief rates were 94.1% (1,551/1,649) and 89.9% (4,962/5,482) following PBC and MVD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.603; p < 0.05), while the long-term rates were 58.1% (921/1,566) and 74.9% (4,549/6,074; OR = 2.089; p < 0.05), respectively. Although a significant higher facial numbness occurred in the PBC group in the early stage, it was mostly diminished 5 years later compared with the MVD group. At long-term follow-up, hypoacusis and facial palsy occurred more often in the MVD group (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Both MVD and PBC provide a satisfactory outcome for the patients in the long term. As a simple, safe, and reliable technique, PBC should be considered as a viable alternative.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of Treatment for Elderly Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia: Percutaneous Balloon Compression Versus Microvascular Decompression.J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Oct;31(7):e685-e688. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006544. J Craniofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32472880
-
Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of trigeminal ganglion for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD).Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Dec;184(4):745-51. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1163-7. Epub 2014 Jun 21. Ir J Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 24951087
-
The long-term clinical outcomes of microvascular decompression for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia compressed by the vertebra-basilar artery: a case series review.BMC Neurol. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1450-z. BMC Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31481028 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression versus percutaneous balloon compression in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;11(4):1391-1400. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3901. Ann Palliat Med. 2022. PMID: 35523747
-
Pain Outcomes Following Microvascular Decompression for Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):182-190. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz075. Neurosurgery. 2020. PMID: 30892607 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Editorial: Advancements in surgical strategies and technologies for cranial nerve disorders.Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1661839. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1661839. eCollection 2025. Front Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40852522 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials