Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 31;46(1):4-9.
doi: 10.14348/molcells.2022.0163. Epub 2022 Dec 9.

RNA in Therapeutics: CRISPR in the Clinic

Affiliations
Review

RNA in Therapeutics: CRISPR in the Clinic

Dana Carroll. Mol Cells. .

Abstract

The advent of the CRISPR-Cas genome editing platform has greatly enhanced the capabilities of researchers in many areas of biology. Its use has also been turned to the development of therapies for genetic diseases and to the enhancement of cell therapies. This review describes some recent advances in these areas.

Keywords: CRISPR; Cas9; base editing; genome editing; prime editing; sickle cell disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

D.C. receives license royalties from Sangamo Therapeutics for use of zinc finger nucleases in genome editing.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Illustration of CRISPR components bound to a DNA target site.
The target DNA is shown as blue lines, the guide RNA as orange lines, and the Cas9 protein as a pale orange shape. Base pairing between target DNA and guide RNA (gRNA) is shown with short, vertical blue and orange lines. The PAM (protospacer adjacent motif) sequence, which is required for target recognition by Cas9, is indicated (purple). PAM is nGG (where n is any base) in the top strand for the commonly used Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9. Base pairing between gRNA and DNA is responsible for sequence-specific recognition; Cas9 has the nuclease activity that cuts both strands of the target DNA (black arrowheads).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Illustration of the cellular repair activities and outcomes following a unique, targeted double-strand break induced by CRISPR.
Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) often leads to insertions and/or deletions (indels) at the target. Homology-dependent repair (HDR) uses a template to copy sequences into the break site; the template can be one provided by the researcher. gRNA, guide RNA. Adapted from the article of Carroll and Charo (2015) (Genome Biol. 16, 242) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Additional CRISPR tools.
(A) Generalized picture of the cytosine and adenine base editors. A version of Cas9 that cuts only the RNA-bound strand (nCas9) is fused to a relevant deaminase that modifies one or a few bases on the displaced DNA strand (red star) at some distance from the PAM (protospacer adjacent motif). The cytosine base editor is also linked to two copies of UNGi, an inhibitor of the cellular uracil N-glycosylase enzyme that would normally remove uracil from DNA (not shown). The nicking activity of Cas9 directs the cellular mismatch repair system to use the modified DNA strand preferentially as the template for repair. (B) Schematic illustration of the prime editor. Cas9 is modified so it only cuts the displaced strand at the target, and it is fused to a viral reverse transcriptase (RTase). The guide RNA (gRNA) is extended at its 3’ end (orange line) with a sequence that has homology to the displaced DNA strand and carries a desired sequence modification to the right (in this picture) of the break in that strand. The RNA-DNA hybrid (orange-blue) is treated as a primer-template complex by RTase, which extends the 3’ end of the DNA across the modification in the RNA. Additional steps lead to the incorporation of this modification into the target. As in the base editors, a second gRNA is provided to create a nick nearby in the bottom strand of the DNA to favor the modified strand as the ultimate template for repair (not shown).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amoasii L., Hildyard J.C.W., Li H., Sanchez-Ortiz E., Mireault A., Caballero D., Harron R., Stathopoulou T.R., Massey C., Shelton J.M., et al. Gene editing restores dystrophin expression in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Science. 2018;362:86–91. doi: 10.1126/science.aau1549. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anzalone A.V., Koblan L.W., Liu D.R. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020;38:824–844. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anzalone A.V., Randolph P.B., Davis J.R., Sousa A.A., Koblan L.W., Levy J.M., Chen P.J., Wilson C., Newby G.A., Raguram A., et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. 2019;576:149–157. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carroll D. Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014;83:409–439. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035418. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carroll D. Collateral damage: benchmarking off-target effects in genome editing. Genome Biol. 2019;20:114. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1725-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources