Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;16(6):488-497.
doi: 10.1177/18632521221138376. Epub 2022 Nov 10.

Pediatric fractures following implant removal: A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Pediatric fractures following implant removal: A systematic review

Anthony M Padgett et al. J Child Orthop. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the available literature for postoperative fracture rates following implant removal in the pediatric population.

Methods: A systematic review of articles in the PubMed and Embase computerized literature databases from January 2000 to June 2022 was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, cohort studies (retrospective and prospective), and case series involving pediatric patients that included data on fracture rate following removal of orthopedic implants were eligible for review. Two authors independently extracted data from selected studies for predefined data fields for implant type, anatomic location of the implant, indication for implantation, fracture or refracture rate following implant removal, mean time to implant removal, and mean follow-up time.

Results: Fifteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Reported fracture rates following implant removal vary based on several factors, with an overall reported incidence of 0%-14.9%. The available literature did not offer sufficient data for conduction of a meta-analysis.

Conclusion: Our systematic review demonstrates that fracture following implant removal in pediatric patients is a relatively frequent complication. In children, the forearm and femur are the most commonly reported sites of fracture following removal of implants. Traumatic fractures treated definitively with external fixation have the highest reported aggregate rate of refracture. Knowledge of the incidence of this risk is important for orthopedic surgeons. There remains a need for well-designed studies and trials to further clarify the roles of the variables that contribute to this complication.

Keywords: Implant removal; fracture; refracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flowchart of studies.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
AP (a) and lateral (b) radiographs following initial closed reduction and casting of a 12-year-old female who suffered a left bone forearm fracture. (c) Radiograph of the forearm at the time of ulnar ESIN removal. (d) Lateral fluoroscopic radiograph demonstrating refracture of the ulnar shaft 12 weeks after ESIN removal.

References

    1. Rutkow IM. Orthopaedic operations in the United States, 1979 through 1983. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68(5): 716–719. - PubMed
    1. Bostman O, Pihlajamaki H. Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units. J Trauma 1996; 41(5): 846–849. - PubMed
    1. Kellam PJ, Harrast J, Weinberg M, et al.. Complications of hardware removal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103(22): 2089–2095. - PubMed
    1. Hanson B, van der Werken C, Stengel D. Surgeons’ beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanitski CL. Metal removal in asymptomatic children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25(4): 557. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources