Examining the clinical impact of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections in a national cohort of the Veterans Health Administration
- PMID: 36484553
- DOI: 10.1002/phar.2747
Examining the clinical impact of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections in a national cohort of the Veterans Health Administration
Abstract
Study objective: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a significant cause of mortality. Use of a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based blood culture identification panel (BCID) may improve antimicrobial utilization and clinical outcomes by shortening the time to appropriate therapy and de-escalating antibiotics among patients on overly broad-spectrum empiric therapy. The effect of BCID on clinical outcomes across varying institutional antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) practices is unclear. This study evaluated clinical outcomes associated with the "real-world" implementation of BCID in a national health system with varying ASP practices.
Design: National, multicenter, retrospective, pre-post quasi-experimental study of hospitalized patients admitted from 2015 to 2020 to VHA facilities, which introduced the BCID for ≥1 year.
Setting: United States Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals with BCID.
Patients: Hospitalized VHA patients with ≥1 blood culture positive for bacteria featured on the BCID panel.
Intervention: Comparison of outcomes between the pre- and post-BCID implementation groups.
Measurements: Outcomes evaluated included early antimicrobial de-escalation within 48 h, defined as reduction in antimicrobial spectrum scores, time to appropriate therapy, and 30-day mortality.
Main results: A total of 4138 patients (pre-BCID, n = 2100; post-BCID, n = 2038) met the study criteria. Implementation of BCID was associated with significant improvements in early antimicrobial de-escalation (34.6%: pre-BCID vs. 38.1%: post-BCID; p = 0.022), which persisted after adjusting for other covariates (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.20; p = 0.011). Median time to appropriate therapy was shorter in the post-BCID implementation group relative to the pre-BCID group (9 h: pre-BCID vs. 8 h: post-BCID, respectively, p = 0.005), and a greater percentage of patients received early appropriate antimicrobial therapy within 48 h in the post-BCID implementation group (91.7%: pre-BCID vs. 93.8%: post-BCID; p = 0.008). In the multivariable regression analysis, BCID implementation was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of appropriate therapy within 48 h (aRR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; p = 0.020). There was no difference in 30-day mortality between groups overall (12.6% pre-BCID vs. 11.2% post-BCID; p = 0.211).
Conclusions: In a "real-world" clinical setting, the implementation of BCID was associated with clinical improvements in antimicrobial utilization. The BCID platform may serve as a useful adjunct for BSI management in facilities with ASP.
Keywords: BioFire; antimicrobial stewardship; antimicrobial stewardship program; blood culture identification; bloodstream infection; multiplex PCR; rapid molecular diagnostic testing.
© 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Benefits of Adding a Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel to an Established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program.J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Oct;54(10):2455-63. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00996-16. Epub 2016 Aug 3. J Clin Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27487951 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.J Pharm Pract. 2022 Oct;35(5):722-729. doi: 10.1177/08971900211000686. Epub 2021 Apr 5. J Pharm Pract. 2022. PMID: 33813935
-
The Impact of Integrating Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel to an Established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the United Arab of Emirates.Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;91:124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.11.028. Epub 2019 Nov 29. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 31786245
-
A Rapid Test for Microbial Identification in Patients With Suspected Sepsis.2017 Sep 1. In: CADTH Issues in Emerging Health Technologies. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2016–2021. 164. 2017 Sep 1. In: CADTH Issues in Emerging Health Technologies. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2016–2021. 164. PMID: 29240356 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Interplay between Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs among Patients with Bloodstream and Other Severe Infections.J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Jan;3(4):601-616. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.026450. Epub 2018 Nov 20. J Appl Lab Med. 2019. PMID: 31639729 Review.
Cited by
-
Opportunity for early de-escalation of antibiotics in Enterobacterales bacteremia with multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic technology.Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 27;5(1):e18. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.488. eCollection 2025. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025. PMID: 39911507 Free PMC article.
-
Large-Scale Clinical Evaluation of Rapid Blood Culture Identification Panels for Bloodstream Infections at a Tertiary Hospital.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 19;13(6):1177. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061177. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36980485 Free PMC article.
-
The role of rapid multiplex molecular syndromic panels in the clinical management of infections in critically ill patients: an experts-opinion document.Crit Care. 2024 Dec 30;28(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05224-3. Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 39736683 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rapid diagnostic testing combined with an immediate infectious disease consultation increases the rate of septic intensive care unit patients on targeted antibiotic therapy.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jan 21;14:1513408. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1513408. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 39906215 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs for the Management of Bloodstream Infection: What Is Their Relative Contribution to Improving Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 16;79(2):502-515. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae234. Clin Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38676943 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Laupland KB. Incidence of bloodstream infection: a review of population-based studies. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;6:492-500.
-
- Timbrook TT, Morton JB, McConeghy KW, Caffrey AR, Mylonakis E, LaPlante KL. The effect of molecular rapid diagnostic testing on clinical outcomes in bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;1:15-23.
-
- Graber CJ, Jones MM, Chou AF, et al. Association of inpatient antimicrobial utilization measures with antimicrobial stewardship activities and facility characteristics of Veterans Affairs medical centers. J Hosp Med. 2017;5:301-309.
-
- Altun O, Almuhayawi M, Ullberg M, Ozenci V. Clinical evaluation of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel in identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;12:4130-4136.
-
- Salimnia H, Fairfax MR, Lephart PR, et al. Evaluation of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel: results of a multicenter controlled trial. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;3:687-698.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous