Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 9;7(1):102.
doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00448-9.

Distinctive Sans Forgetica font does not benefit memory accuracy in the DRM paradigm

Affiliations

Distinctive Sans Forgetica font does not benefit memory accuracy in the DRM paradigm

Mark J Huff et al. Cogn Res Princ Implic. .

Abstract

A common method used by memory scholars to enhance retention is to make materials more challenging to learn-a benefit termed desirable difficulties. Recently, researchers have investigated the efficacy of Sans Forgetica, a perceptually disfluent/distinctive font which may increase processing effort required at study and enhance memory as a result. We examined the effects of Sans Forgetica relative to a standard control font (Arial) on both correct memory and associative memory errors using the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false memory paradigm, to evaluate Sans Forgetica effects on overall memory accuracy. Across four experiments, which included nearly 300 participants, Sans Forgetica was found to have no impact on correct or false memory of DRM lists relative to a standard Arial control font, regardless of whether font type was manipulated within or between subjects or whether memory was assessed via free recall or recognition testing. Our results indicate that Sans Forgetica is ineffective for improving memory accuracy even when accounting for associative memory errors.

Keywords: Associative memory errors; Distinctiveness; Free recall; Recognition; Sans Forgetica.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of DRM lists presented using Sans Forgetica font (left) and Arial font (right)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arndt J, Reder LM. The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 2003;48(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00518-1. - DOI
    1. Bertsch S, Pesta BJ, Wiscott R, McDaniel MA. The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition. 2007;35:201–210. doi: 10.3758/BF03193441. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjork EL, Bjork RA. Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In: Gernsbacher MA, Pew RW, Hough LM, Pomerantz JR, editors. Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society. Worth Publishers; 2011. pp. 56–64.
    1. Bjork RA. Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In: Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP, editors. Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. The MIT Press; 1994. pp. 185–205.
    1. Bjork RA, Bjork EL. Desirable difficulties in theory and practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2020;9(4):475–479. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.003. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources