Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2244679.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44679.

Characterization of Problematic Alcohol Use Among Physicians: A Systematic Review

Janet Wilson  1 , Peter Tanuseputro  2   3   4   5 , Daniel T Myran  3   6   7 , Shan Dhaliwal  1 , Junayd Hussain  8 , Patrick Tang  2 , Salmi Noor  1 , Rhiannon L Roberts  2 , Marco Solmi  2   6   9   10   11 , Manish M Sood  2   4
Affiliations

Characterization of Problematic Alcohol Use Among Physicians: A Systematic Review

Janet Wilson et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Problematic alcohol use in physicians poses a serious concern to physicians' health and their ability to provide care. Understanding the extent and characteristics of physicians with problematic alcohol use will help inform interventions.

Objective: To estimate the extent of problematic alcohol use in physicians and how it differs by physician sex, age, medical specialty, and career stage (eg, residency vs practicing physician).

Evidence review: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020-compliant systematic review, searching Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo from January 2006 to March 2020. Search terms included Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to physicians as the population and problematic alcohol use as the primary outcome. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We included articles where problematic alcohol use was measured by a validated tool (ie, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT], AUDIT Version C [AUDIT-C], or CAGE [Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, and Eye-opener] questionnaire) in practicing physicians (ie, residents, fellows, or staff physicians).

Findings: Thirty-one studies involving 51 680 participants in 17 countries published between January 2006 and March 2020 were included. All study designs were cross-sectional, self-reported surveys. Problematic alcohol use varied widely regardless of measurement method (0 to 34% with AUDIT; 9% to 35% with AUDIT-C; 4% to 22% with CAGE). Reported problematic alcohol use increased over time from 16.3% in 2006 to 2010 to 26.8% in 2017 to 2020. The extent of problematic use by sex was examined in 19 studies, by age in 12 studies, by specialty in 7 studies, and by career stage in 5 studies. Seven of 19 studies (37%) identified that problematic alcohol use was more common in males than females. Based on the wide heterogeneity of methods for included studies, limited conclusions can be made on how problematic alcohol use varies based on physician age, sex, specialty, and career stage.

Conclusions and relevance: Studies about problematic alcohol use in physicians demonstrate a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of methods of measurement, definitions for problematic alcohol use, and cohorts assessed. Most studies are primarily self-reported, precluding the ability to determine the true prevalence among the profession. Few studies provide relevant comparisons to aid in identifying key risk groups for targeted interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Mr Dhaliwal reported receiving a Government of Ontario Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology and a Mitacs Globalink Research Award outside the submitted work. Dr Solmi reported receiving personal fees from Angelini, Lundbeck, and Otsuka outside the submitted work. Dr Sood reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Flowchart of Study Selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mihailescu M, Neiterman E. A scoping review of the literature on the current mental health status of physicians and physicians-in-training in North America. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1363. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7661-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rotenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, et al. . Prevalence of Burnout Among Physicians: a Systematic Review. JAMA. 2018;320(11):1131-1150. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12777 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mata DA, Ramos MA, Bansal N, et al. . Prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms among resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;314(22):2373-2383. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.15845 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marques-Pinto A, Moreira S, Costa-Lopes R, Zózimo N, Vala J. Predictors of burnout among physicians: evidence from a national study in Portugal. Front Psychol. 2021;12:699974. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699974 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker K, Warren R, Abelson JL, Sen S. Physician mental health: Depression and anxiety. In: Physician Mental Health and Well-Being: Research and Practice. Integrating psychiatry and primary care. Springer International Publishing; 2017:131-150. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55583-6_6 - DOI

Publication types