Does the primary treatment sequence affect post-relapse survival in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer? A real-world multicentre retrospective study
- PMID: 36485065
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17329
Does the primary treatment sequence affect post-relapse survival in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer? A real-world multicentre retrospective study
Abstract
Objective: To explore the impact of the primary treatment sequence (primary debulking surgery, PDS, versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery, NACT-IDS) on post-relapse survival (PRS) and recurrence characteristics of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (REOC).
Design: Real-world retrospective study.
Setting: Tertiary hospitals in China.
Population: A total of 853 patients with REOC at International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stages IIIC-IV from September 2007 to June 2020. Overall, 377 and 476 patients received NACT-IDS and PDS, respectively.
Methods: Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to balance the between-group differences.
Main outcome measures: Clinicopathological factors related to PRS.
Results: The overall median PRS was 29.3 months (95% CI 27.0-31.5 months). Multivariate analysis before and after IPTW adjustment showed that NACT-IDS and residual R1/R2 disease were independent risk factors for PRS (p < 0.05). Patients with diffuse carcinomatosis and platinum-free interval (PFI) ≤ 12 months had a significantly worse PRS (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that NACT-IDS was an independent risk factor for diffuse carcinomatosis (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.82, p = 0.040) and PFI ≤ 12 months (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35, p = 0.019). In IPTW analysis, NACT-IDS was still significantly associated with diffuse carcinomatosis (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.58, p = 0.015) and PFI ≤ 12 months (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.52-2.38, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The primary treatment sequence may affect the PRS of patients with REOC by altering the recurrence pattern and PFI duration.
Keywords: advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; post-relapse survival; primary debulking surgery; recurrence pattern.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, Jayson GC, Kitchener H, Lopes T, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):249-57.
-
- Redman CW, Warwick J, Luesley DM, Varma R, Lawton FG, Blackledge GR. Intervention debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(2):142-6.
-
- Rose PG, Nerenstone S, Brady MF, Clarke-Pearson D, Olt G, Rubin SC, et al. Secondary surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(24):2489-97.
-
- van der Burg ME, van Lent M, Buyse M, Kobierska A, Colombo N, Favalli G, et al. The effect of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy on the prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecological cancer cooperative Group of the European Organization for research and treatment of cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(10):629-34.
-
- Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(10):943-53.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- The National Key Technology Research and Development Programme of China, Grant/Award Number: 2022YFC2704200; Beijing Kanghua Foundation for the Development of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
- 82072889/National Science Foundation of China
- 81772787/National Science Foundation of China
- 20A0769/Major Project of Chinese Society of Medical Education
- Y-2019AZQN-0385/Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology research foundation
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
