Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):3789.
doi: 10.3390/foods11233789.

Aromatic Characteristics of Passion Fruit Wines Measured by E-Nose, GC-Quadrupole MS, GC-Orbitrap-MS and Sensory Evaluation

Affiliations

Aromatic Characteristics of Passion Fruit Wines Measured by E-Nose, GC-Quadrupole MS, GC-Orbitrap-MS and Sensory Evaluation

Ruojin Liu et al. Foods. .

Abstract

This study investigated the volatile composition and aromatic features of passion fruit wines using a combination of gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-qMS), gas chromatography-Orbitrap-mass spectrometry (GC-Orbitrap-MS), electronic nose (E-nose) and sensory evaluation. The results showed that these passion fruit wines possessed different aromatic features confirmed by E-nose. Seventeen sulfur compounds and seventy-eight volatiles were detected in these passion fruit wines using GC-Orbitrap-MS and GC-qMS, respectively. Forty-four volatiles significantly contributed to the overall wine aroma. These wines possessed passion fruit, mango, green apple, lemon and floral aromas confirmed by sensory evaluation. The partial least squares regression analysis indicated that sulfides, esters and terpenes, and terpenes mainly correlated to the passion fruit, mango and green apple aroma, respectively. Sulfur compounds significantly affected the aroma of passion fruit wine. The findings in this study could provide useful insight toward the quality control of passion fruit wine.

Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; aroma; passion fruit wine; sensory attributes; volatiles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that no conflict of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Principal component analysis of passion fruit wine fermented by commercial yeast strain ES488 (ES), BV818 (BV), VIC (VI) and CY3079 (CY). (A) The scores plot of passion fruit wine samples and (B) the loadings analysis of different metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) − type chemical sensors: 1 (aromatic), 2 (broad range), 3 (aromatic), 4 (hydrogen), 5 (arom − aliph), 6 (broad − methane), 7 (sulfur − organic), 8 (broad − alcohol), 9 (sulph − chlor) and 10 (methane − aliph).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensory attributes of passion fruit wine fermented by commercial yeast strain ES488 (ES), BV818 (BV), VIC (VI) and CY3079 (CY) using a professional panel. The geometric mean (GM%) was used to assess the aromatic features of these passion fruit wine samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Partial least squares regression (PLSR) analysis using volatile compounds (OAV > 1 or esters OAV > 0.1, as listed in Table 4) and aroma descriptors (passion fruit, mango, green apple, lemon and floral with GM% > 20%) in passion fruit wine fermented by commercial yeast strain ES488 (ES), BV818 (BV), VIC (VI) and CY3079 (CY).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dhawan K., Dhawan S., Sharma A. Passiflora: A review update. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004;94:1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.02.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Janzantti N.S., Monteiro M. Changes in the aroma of organic passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims f. flavicarpa Deg.) during ripeness. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014;59:612–620. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.07.044. - DOI
    1. Swiegers J.H., Pretorius I.S. Yeast modulation of wine flavor. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2005;57:131–175. - PubMed
    1. Styger G., Prior B., Bauer F.F. Wine flavor and aroma. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011;38:1145–1159. doi: 10.1007/s10295-011-1018-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jagtap U.B., Bapat V.A. Wines from fruits other than grapes: Current status and future prospectus. Food Biosci. 2015;9:80–96. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2014.12.002. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources