Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 24;14(23):5786.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14235786.

Staging Breast Cancer with MRI, the T. A Key Role in the Neoadjuvant Setting

Affiliations
Review

Staging Breast Cancer with MRI, the T. A Key Role in the Neoadjuvant Setting

Camilla Panico et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) indications have expanded from inoperable locally advanced to early-stage breast cancer. Achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) has been proven to be an excellent prognostic marker leading to better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Although diagnostic accuracy of MRI has been shown repeatedly to be superior to conventional methods in assessing the extent of breast disease there are still controversies regarding the indication of MRI in this setting. We intended to review the complex literature concerning the tumor size in staging, response and surgical planning in patients with early breast cancer receiving NACT, in order to clarify the role of MRI. Morphological and functional MRI techniques are making headway in the assessment of the tumor size in the staging, residual tumor assessment and prediction of response. Radiomics and radiogenomics MRI applications in the setting of the prediction of response to NACT in breast cancer are continuously increasing. Tailored therapy strategies allow considerations of treatment de-escalation in excellent responders and avoiding or at least postponing breast surgery in selected patients.

Keywords: early-stage breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathological complete response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 51-year-old patient with invasive ductal carcinoma (ER 40% PR 3% Ki67 40% HER2 3+) of the upper outer quadrant of the left breast. Pre-NACT CE-MRI revealed an area of non-mass enhancement with segmental distribution in the left breast that extends to pectoralis muscle without signs of invasion (red circle, (a) axial maximum intensity projection reconstruction image; red circle, (b), sagittal post-contrast T1-weighted image). At the end of NACT, CE-MRI showed no residual tumor (pCR) ((c) axial maximum intensity projection reconstruction image; (d) sagittal post-contrast T1-weighted image).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 48-year-old patient with G2, luminal B, HER2 positive right breast cancer undergoing NACT. Pre-treatment breast CE-MRI showed an oval mass with irregular margins, nipple invasion and skin retraction at the junction of upper quadrants of the right breast (red circle, (a) axial maximum intensity projection reconstruction image) (red circle, (b) sagittal post-contrast T1-weighted image). After NACT, multifocal shrinkage was depicted by CE-MRI (red circle (c), axial maximum intensity projection reconstruction image). (d) Signal void artifact caused by tissue marker clip inside the residual mass is well visible on the sagittal T1-weighted post-contrast image (red arrow).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sharma R. Breast cancer incidence, mortality, and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) are associated with human development, 1990–2016: Evidence from Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:428–445. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-00941-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Masood S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers. Women’s Health. 2016;12:480–491. doi: 10.1177/1745505716677139. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mauri D., Pavlidis N., Ioannidis J.P. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: A meta-analysis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005;97:188–194. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vugts G., Maaskant-Braat A.J., Nieuwenhuijzen G.A., Roumen R.M., Luiten E.J., Voogd A.C. Patterns of care in the administration of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. A population based study. Breast J. 2016;22:316–321. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12568. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curigliano G., Burstein H.J., Winer E.P., Gnant M., Dubsky P., Loibl S., Colleoni M., Regan M.M., Piccart-Gebhart M., Senn H.J., et al. De- escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: The St. Gallen international expert consensus conference on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2017. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:2153. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx806. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources