Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 3;14(23):5983.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14235983.

Efficacy, Safety, and Challenges of CAR T-Cells in the Treatment of Solid Tumors

Affiliations
Review

Efficacy, Safety, and Challenges of CAR T-Cells in the Treatment of Solid Tumors

Qiuqiang Chen et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Immunotherapy has been the fifth pillar of cancer treatment in the past decade. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a newly designed adoptive immunotherapy that is able to target and further eliminate cancer cells by engaging with MHC-independent tumor-antigens. CAR T-cell therapy has exhibited conspicuous clinical efficacy in hematological malignancies, but more than half of patients will relapse. Of note, the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy has been even more disappointing in solid tumors. These challenges mainly include (1) the failures of CAR T-cells to treat highly heterogeneous solid tumors due to the difficulty in identifying unique tumor antigen targets, (2) the expression of target antigens in non-cancer cells, (3) the inability of CAR T-cells to effectively infiltrate solid tumors, (4) the short lifespan and lack of persistence of CAR T-cells, and (5) cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. In combination with these characteristics, the ideal CAR T-cell therapy for solid tumors should maintain adequate T-cell response over a long term while sparing healthy tissues. This article reviewed the status, clinical application, efficacy, safety, and challenges of CAR T-cell therapies, as well as the latest progress of CAR T-cell therapies for solid tumors. In addition, the potential strategies to improve the efficacy of CAR T-cells and prevent side effects in solid tumors were also explored.

Keywords: CAR (chimeric antigen receptor); CRS (cytokine release syndrome); ICANS (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome); T cell exhaustion; antigen; efficacy; hematological malignancy; heterogeneity; safety; solid tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Production, application, and activity monitoring of CAR T-cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Active CAR T-cell therapies developed in 2022 and 2021. (a) A total of 1432 active CAR T-cell therapies have been developed in 2022, including preclinical research (854), phase I (314), phase II (243), phase III and market trials of 21. (b) A total of 1150 active CAR T-cell therapies were developed in 2021, including 633 preclinical research, 279 phase I, 227 phase II, 11 phase III and market trials.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Active CAR T-cell therapies in leukemia in 2022. A total of 134 CAR T-cell trials were conducted in 2022 based on different targets.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of active CAR T-cell trials investigated in 2022. Based on the different antigenic targets, 4 CAR T-cell products are anti-HER2, 6 CAR T-cell products are anti-4 MSLN, 7 CAR T-cell products are anti-4 GPC, 10 CAR T-cell products are anti-EGFR.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in the treatment of solid tumors are always at opposite ends of the scale. (a) the balance between safety and efficacy, (b) higher safety, lower efficacy: safety improves always at the expense of efficacy, (c) higher efficacy, lower safety, efficacy improves always at the expense of safety.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Possible reasons for the failure to sustain remission after CAR T-cell therapies. (1) CAR T-cell products: CAR T-cell product from some patients may not be successfully manufactured due to T cell problems (e.g., autologous T cells obtained from the patients after chemotherapy), or the produced CAR T-cells may not expand adequately either during in vitro culture or after infusion in vivo. Limited persistence of CAR T-cells in other patients is a potential mechanism for disease recurrence. (2). Antigen expression: The absence or downregulation of antigens on the tumor cell surfaces, allows antigen escape as a mechanism of resistance to CAR T-cell therapy. (3). Severe toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy: The fatal toxicity of CAR T-cell therapy (e.g., CRS and/or neurotoxicity) prevents a small percentage of patients benefit from the potential therapeutic of CAR T-cell therapy. (4). Optimization of CAR T-cell therapy in clinical application: For the treatment of the patients with pediatric lymphoma, and solid tumors, CAR T- cell therapy need to be further optimized.

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yao L., Jia G., Lu L., Bao Y., Ma W. Factors affecting tumor responders and predictive biomarkers of toxicities in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;85:106628. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106628. - DOI - PubMed
    1. He X., Xu C. Immune checkpoint signaling and cancer immunotherapy. Cell. Res. 2020;30:660–669. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0343-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robert C. A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3801. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17670-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flego M., Frau A., Accardi L., Mallano A., Ascione A., Gellini M., Fanunza E., Vella S., Di Bonito P., Tramontano E. Intracellular human antibody fragments recognizing the VP35 protein of Zaire Ebola filovirus inhibit the protein activity. BMC Biotechnol. 2019;19:64. doi: 10.1186/s12896-019-0554-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed