Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15659.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315659.

Sexual Orientation and Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Media Sites

Affiliations

Sexual Orientation and Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Media Sites

Ionela Șerban et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Little research has been focused on offline or online infidelity in GL dating relationships, especially in a post-communist socio-cultural context. Infidelity-related (IR) behaviors on social media sites might be as hurtful to relationships as offline infidelity, both in gay, lesbian (GL) and heterosexual romantic monogamous relationships. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to examine the associations between dyadic satisfaction, attitudes toward infidelity, and problematic internet usage, with IR behaviors on social media sites among GL and heterosexual unmarried individuals in Romanian sexual minority communities. Results showed that GL respondents did not significantly differ from heterosexual participants regarding IR behaviors. Furthermore, we found the main effect of attitudes toward infidelity and problematic internet use on IR behaviors. Sexual orientation highlights the main effect of IR behaviors when analyzed with dyadic satisfaction. The current study may be a precursor to further research investigating correlations in online IR behavior among lesbian and gay individuals engaging in consensual nonmonogamy. Implications of the findings are discussed in the social context of a post-communist country where GL individuals may face discrimination and stigma because of their sexual orientation.

Keywords: dyadic satisfaction; gay; lesbian; online infidelity; same-sex couples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Krämer N.C., Winter S. Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. J. Media Psychol. 2008;20:106–116. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105.20.3.106. - DOI
    1. Nguyen M.H., Gruber J., Marler W., Hunsaker A., Fuchs J., Hargittai E. Staying connected while physically apart: Digital communication when face-to-face interactions are limited. New Media Soc. 2021;24:2046–2067. doi: 10.1177/1461444820985442. - DOI
    1. Laffond K.W., Mossler D.G. Reflection of personality through a facebook analysis. H-SC J. Sci. 2013;2:1–4.
    1. Boyd D.M., Ellison N.B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2007;13:210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x. - DOI
    1. McDaniel B.T., Drouin M., Cravens J.D. Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017;66:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources