Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15682.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315682.

What Influences Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model

Affiliations

What Influences Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model

Yuxuan Xu et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Along with the increasing prominence of environmental risks such as soil surface source pollution and declining quality grade of arable land, the issues of how to address irrational fertilizer application and enhance the safety of agricultural products have attracted widespread attention. In this context, clarifying the main factors affecting farmers' use of soil testing and formulated fertilization technology (STFFT) can further improve the technology adoption rate and fertilizer utilization efficiency, promote standardized agricultural production and maintain the health and stability of soil ecology in black soil areas. This is of great significance to the construction of green agriculture, national dietary health and national food security. This study builds an "external environmental stimuli-perceived characteristics-adoption behavior" theoretical framework to investigate the decision-making and the dynamic influence mechanisms of farmers' adoption behavior of STFFT. Based on farmer survey data, the logistic-ISM model has been applied. The main findings are as follows. First, five types of influencing factors, namely individual characteristics, family characteristics, business characteristics, cognitive characteristics and external environmental characteristics, had significant "push" effects on farmers' STFFT adoption behavior. Among them, planting scale and technical training are the key factors influencing farmers' adoption of scientific fertilizer application technology. Second, both farmers' perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness play a significant role in farmers' decision-making process, and the easier farmers perceive STFFT to be to master and the greater the benefits it brings, the more pronounced the tendency to adopt the technology, all other influencing conditions being equal. Third, the main influencing factors of farmers' STFFT adoption behavior are intrinsically related and divided into four categories based on the magnitude of influence: deep-rooted, medium indirect, shallow indirect and superficial direct. In order to reduce further degradation of black soil caused by farmers' irrational production habits and to improve resource utilization efficiency, this study recommends the government to further regulate the land transfer market, strengthen the propagation of soil-conservation-type technologies in black soil areas, expand the breadth of agricultural technology training and enhance farmers' understanding and trust in STFFT. Thus, the maintenance of soil ecosystem in black soil areas, effective guarantee of food security and sustainable development of agriculture can be achieved.

Keywords: black soil ecosystem conservation; logistic-ISM model; soil testing and formulated fertilization technology; technology adoption behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical analysis framework of “external environmental stimulus–perceived characteristics–adopted behavior”.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Map of the study area and spatial distribution of the sample villages.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Map of background factors for farmers using STFFT.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The logic relationship of elements. Where C indicates that the column element directly affects the row factor; L indicates that the row element directly affects the column factor; and 0 indicates that the row element has no relationship with the column factor.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The interpretative structural model of factors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sridhar A., Balakrishnan A., Jacob M.M., Sillanpää M., Dayanandan N. Global impact of COVID-19 on agriculture: Role of sustainable agriculture and digital farming. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022;2022:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19358-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birhan D.A., Zaitchik B.F., Fantaye K.T., Birhanu B.S., Damot G.A., Tsegaye E.A. Observed and projected trends in climate extremes in a tropical highland region: An agroecosystem perspective. Int. J. Climatol. 2022;42:2493–2513. doi: 10.1002/joc.7378. - DOI
    1. Nekmahmud M. Food consumption behavior, food supply chain disruption, and food security crisis during the COVID-19: The mediating effect of food price and food stress. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2022;7:3017–3026. doi: 10.1080/15378020.2022.2090802. - DOI
    1. Chen X., Ma L., Ma W., Wu Z., Cui Z., Hou Y., Zhang F. What has caused the use of fertilizers to skyrocket in China? Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems. 2018;110:241–255. doi: 10.1007/s10705-017-9895-1. - DOI
    1. Wu Y., Xi X., Tang X., Luo D., Gu B., Lam S.K., Vitousek P.M., Chen D. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:7010–7015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806645115. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources