Gender Differences in the Indirect Effect of Psychosocial Work Environment in the Association of Precarious Employment and Chronic Stress: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis
- PMID: 36498147
- PMCID: PMC9736292
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316073
Gender Differences in the Indirect Effect of Psychosocial Work Environment in the Association of Precarious Employment and Chronic Stress: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis
Abstract
Gender differences in the association between precarious employment and chronic stress have been found but the mechanisms underlying this relationship have not been explored. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the mediating effects of psychosocial risk factors at work (i.e., demands, control, and support) and work-life conflicts in the relationship between precarious employment and chronic stress as measured through the production of steroid hormones (both adrenal and gonadal) for men and women separately. Cross-sectional data were derived from a sample of workers from Barcelona (n = 125-255 men; 130 women). A set of 23 markers were determined from hair samples to evaluate the production of both adrenal and gonadal steroids. Decomposition analyses were applied to estimate the indirect effects of psychosocial risk factors and work-life conflict using linear regression models. Gender differences in the association between precarious employment and steroids production were confirmed. Psychosocial risk factors and work-life conflicts had indirect effects only among women (βCortisol = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.04-0.32; βCortisol/Cortisone 0.19; 95% CI: 0.08-0.31; β%Cortisol 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05-0.20). Gender differences suggest that the physiological response to precarious employment could be determined by the social construction of gender identities, as well as by positions and roles in the labour market and family. Future studies should delve further into these differences to improve employment and working policies, thus mitigating gender inequalities in the labour market to prevent work-related stress.
Keywords: cortisol; gender; precarious employment; psychosocial risk factors; stress.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
-
- Kreshpaj B., Orellana C., Burström B., Davis L., Hemmingsson T., Johansson G., Kjellberg K., Jonsson J., Wegman D.H., Bodin T. What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health. 2020;46:235–247. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3875. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Buchholz S., Hofäcker D., Mills M., Blossfeld H.-P., Kurz K., Hofmeister H. Life Courses in the Globalization Process: The Development of Social Inequalities in Modern Societies. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 2009;25:53–71. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn033. - DOI
-
- Bolibar M., Belvis F.X., Jódar P., Vives A., Méndez F., Bartoll-Roca X., Pozo O.J., Gomez-Gomez A., Padrosa E., Benach J., et al. Precarious Employment and Stress: The Biomedical Embodiment of Social Factors. PRESSED Project Study Protocol. Front. Public Health. 2021;9:262. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.649447. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical