Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 4;19(23):16225.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316225.

The Effects and Costs of Personalized Budgets for People with Disabilities: A Systematic Review

Marguerite Robinson  1 , Marie Blaise  1 , Germain Weber  2 , Marc Suhrcke  1   3
Affiliations

The Effects and Costs of Personalized Budgets for People with Disabilities: A Systematic Review

Marguerite Robinson et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This article reviews the peer-reviewed and grey literature published from January 1985 to November 2022 that has quantitatively evaluated the effects of personalized budgets for people with disabilities (PwDs), in terms of a range of benefit and cost outcomes. Benefit metrics of interest comprised measures of well-being, service satisfaction and use, quality of life, health, and unmet needs. A search was conducted using the PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ASSIA, and Social Care Online databases. Based on inclusion criteria and a quality assessment using the Downs and Black Checklist, a final count of 23 studies were identified for in-depth review. Given the heterogeneous nature of the studies, a narrative synthesis, rather than a formal meta-analysis, was undertaken. Taking the relatively scarce and often methodologically limited evidence base at face value, the findings suggest that-overall-personalized budget users tend to benefit in terms of well-being and service satisfaction outcomes, with the exception of mixed effects for people with mental health conditions. Only a minority of studies have investigated the cost-effectiveness or costs-only of personalized budgets, finding mixed results. Two out of the three cost-effectiveness studies find personal budgets to be more cost-effective than alternative options, meaning that the possibly higher costs of personalized budgets may be more than outweighed by additional benefits. Some evidence looking at service use and/or costs only also points to significant reductions in certain service use areas, which at least hints at the potential that personalized budgeting may-in some cases-entail reduced costs. Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of these conclusions and to better capture and understand the factors driving the observed heterogeneity in some of the results.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; disability; personal budgets; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Quality assessment scores from the Downs and Black checklist.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. United Nations General Assembly . Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) United Nations; Geneva, Switzerland: 2006. [(accessed on 30 November 2022)]. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-right....
    1. Dickinson H., Glasby J. The Personalisation Agenda: Implications for the Third Sector. University of Birmingham; Birmingham, UK: 2010. [(accessed on 30 November 2022)]. Working Paper. Available online: https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/social-po....
    1. Gadsby E.W., Segar J., Allen P., Checkland K., Coleman A., McDermott I., Peckham S. Personal budgets, choice and health—A review of international evidence from 11 OECD countries: A review of international evidence from 11 OECD countries. Int. J. Public Priv. Health Manag. Econ. 2013;3:15–28. doi: 10.4018/ijpphme.2013070102. - DOI
    1. Mladenov T. What is good personal assistance made of? Results of a European survey. Disabil. Soc. 2020;35:1–24. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1621740. - DOI
    1. Camoni L., Picardi A., Venerosi A. New mode of care. Value and limit of the person-centered care planning for people with mental disability. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita. 2020;56:193–205. doi: 10.4415/ann_20_02_09. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types