Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 30;11(23):7138.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11237138.

Towards the Validation of Executive Functioning Assessments: A Clinical Study

Affiliations

Towards the Validation of Executive Functioning Assessments: A Clinical Study

Daniel Faber et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Neuropsychological assessment needs a more profound grounding in psychometric theory. Specifically, psychometrically reliable and valid tools are required, both in patient care and in scientific research. The present study examined convergent and discriminant validity of some of the most popular indicators of executive functioning (EF). A sample of 96 neurological inpatients (aged 18-68 years) completed a battery of standardized cognitive tests (Raven's matrices, vocabulary test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, verbal fluency test, figural fluency test). Convergent validity of indicators of intelligence (Raven's matrices, vocabulary test) and of indicators of EF (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, verbal fluency test, figural fluency) were calculated. Discriminant validity of indicators of EF against indicators of intelligence was also calculated. Convergent validity of indicators of intelligence (Raven's matrices, vocabulary test) was good (rxtyt = 0.727; R2 = 0.53). Convergent validity of fluency indicators of EF against executive cognition as indicated by performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was poor (0.087 ≤ rxtyt ≤ 0.304; 0.008 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.092). Discriminant validity of indicators of EF against indicators of intelligence was good (0.106 ≤ rxtyt ≤ 0.548; 0.011 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.300). Our conclusions from these data are clear-cut: apparently dissimilar indicators of intelligence converge on general intellectual ability. Apparently dissimilar indicators of EF (mental fluency, executive cognition) do not converge on general executive ability. Executive abilities, although non-unitary, can be reasonably well distinguished from intellectual ability. The present data contribute to the hitherto meager evidence base regarding the validity of popular indicators of EF.

Keywords: Raven’s matrices; Wisconsin card sorting; executive function; figural fluency; intelligence; neuropsychological assessment; psychometric theory; validity; verbal fluency; vocabulary test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lezak M.D., Howieson D.B., Bigler E.D., Tranel D. In: Neuropsychological Assessment. 5th ed. Press O.U., editor. Oxford University Press; Oxford, MS, USA: 2012.
    1. Banich M.T. Executive Function: The Search for an Integrated Account. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2009;18:89–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01615.x. - DOI
    1. Diamond A. Executive Functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013;64:135–168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001;24:167–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suchy Y. Executive Functioning: Overview, Assessment, and Research Issues for Non-Neuropsychologists. Ann. Behav. Med. 2009;37:106–116. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9097-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources