Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 6;22(23):9532.
doi: 10.3390/s22239532.

Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Architecture Supported by a Distributed Data Acquisition System

Affiliations

Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Architecture Supported by a Distributed Data Acquisition System

Arezki Abderrahim Chellal et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Rehabilitation robotics aims to facilitate the rehabilitation procedure for patients and physical therapists. This field has a relatively long history dating back to the 1990s; however, their implementation and the standardisation of their application in the medical field does not follow the same pace, mainly due to their complexity of reproduction and the need for their approval by the authorities. This paper aims to describe architecture that can be applied to industrial robots and promote their application in healthcare ecosystems. The control of the robotic arm is performed using the software called SmartHealth, offering a 2 Degree of Autonomy (DOA). Data are gathered through electromyography (EMG) and force sensors at a frequency of 45 Hz. It also proves the capabilities of such small robots in performing such medical procedures. Four exercises focused on shoulder rehabilitation (passive, restricted active-assisted, free active-assisted and Activities of Daily Living (ADL)) were carried out and confirmed the viability of the proposed architecture and the potential of small robots (i.e., the UR3) in rehabilitation procedure accomplishment. This robot can perform the majority of the default exercises in addition to ADLs but, nevertheless, their limits were also uncovered, mainly due to their limited Range of Motion (ROM) and cost.

Keywords: UR3; data acquisition; electromyography sensor; graphical user interface; rehabilitation robotics; upper limb.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the overall system architecture.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SmartHealth, control software graphical interface in an idle state. (a) Patient tab, with the different patient registered in the software. (b) Setting tab, with a slide showing the different parameters that can be plotted.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Operation flowchart for the remote control system, part 1. White color defines the flowchart in the software. Blue color defines the flowchart in the robot. Yellow color defines the flowchart in the shimmer sensor.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Operation flowchart for the remote control system, part 2. White color defines the flowchart in the software. Blue color defines the flowchart in the robot. Yellow color defines the flowchart in the shimmer sensor.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Custom exercise experimentation. (ac) Person driving the robot and the subject’s hand, with the software recording the data. (df) The robot driving the patient’s hand following the exact path recorded, with the software displaying the force data in (x,y,z) on-the-fly.
Figure 6
Figure 6
General control block diagram for active-assisted rehabilitation exercise.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Control block diagram for active-assisted rehabilitation exercise in y and z axis for 2nd and 3rd exercise.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Top view of the Lateral Shoulder Rotation exercise performed by the UR3 robot. (a) Beginning of the repetition. (b) Middle of the repetition. (c) Reaching the limit of the patient’s admissible range of motion. Blue line represents the path followed by the robot [38].
Figure 9
Figure 9
Experimental test for passive Lateral Shoulder Rotation. (a) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,y). (b) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,y,z). (c) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,z). (d) Forces gathered by the Robotiq sensor in (x,y,z) in relations with the samples.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Experimental test for passive Lateral Shoulder Rotation. (a) Muscle activity for the Deltoid muscle. (b) Muscle activity for the Latissimus Dorsi. (c) Robot position in x in relation to the samples.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Experimental test for restricted active-assisted lateral shoulder rotation. (a) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,y). (b) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,y,z). (c) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,z). (d) Forces gathered by the Robotiq sensor in (x,y,z) in relations with the samples.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Experimental test for restricted active-assisted lateral shoulder rotation. (a) Muscle activity for the Deltoid muscle. (b) Muscle activity for the Latissimus Dorsi. (c) Robot position in x in relation to the samples.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Experimental test for a free Active-Assisted lateral shoulder rotation. (a) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,y). (b) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,y,z). (c) Robot path performed in contrast with the reference path in (x,z). (d) Forces gathered by the Robotiq sensor in (x,y,z) in relations with the samples.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Experimental test for a free Active-Assisted lateral shoulder rotation. (a) Muscle activity for the Deltoid muscle. (b) Muscle activity for the Latissimus Dorsi. (c) Robot position in x in relation to the samples.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Experimental test for an ADL based rehabilitation—drinking case.

References

    1. Chellal A.A., Lima J., Fernandes F.P., Gonçalves J., Pacheco M.F., Monteiro F.C. International Conference on Optimization, Learning Algorithms and Applications. Springer; Bragança, Portugal: 2021. Overview of robotic based system for rehabilitation and healthcare; pp. 515–530.
    1. Li M., Zhang J., Zuo G., Feng G., Zhang X. Assist-as-needed control strategy of bilateral upper limb rehabilitation robot based on GMM. Machines. 2022;10:76. doi: 10.3390/machines10020076. - DOI
    1. Laut J., Porfiri M., Raghavan P. The present and future of robotic technology in rehabilitation. Curr. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Rep. 2016;4:312–319. doi: 10.1007/s40141-016-0139-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zanchettin A.M., Facciotti F. A collaborative robotic solution to partly automate SARS-CoV-2 serological tests in small facilities. Slas Technol. 2022;27:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.slast.2021.10.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen Y., Guo D., Long F., Mateos L.A., Ding H., Xiu Z., Tan H. Robots under COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access. 2020;9:1590–1615. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045792. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources