Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 6;22(23):9542.
doi: 10.3390/s22239542.

Repeatability of the Vibroarthrogram in the Temporomandibular Joints

Affiliations

Repeatability of the Vibroarthrogram in the Temporomandibular Joints

Adam Łysiak et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Current research concerning the repeatability of the joint's sounds examination in the temporomandibular joints (TMJ) is inconclusive; thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the repeatability of the specific features of the vibroarthrogram (VAG) in the TMJ using accelerometers. The joint sounds of both TMJs were measured with VAG accelerometers in two groups, study and control, each consisting of 47 participants (n = 94). Two VAG recording sessions consisted of 10 jaw open/close cycles guided by a metronome. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for seven VAG signal features. Additionally, a k-nearest-neighbors (KNN) classifier was defined and compared with a state-of-the-art method (joint vibration analysis (JVA) decision tree). ICC indicated excellent (for the integral below 300 Hz feature), good (total integral, integral above 300 Hz, and median frequency features), moderate (integral below to integral above 300 Hz ratio feature) and poor (peak amplitude feature) reliability. The accuracy scores for the KNN classifier (up to 0.81) were higher than those for the JVA decision tree (up to 0.60). The results of this study could open up a new field of research focused on the features of the vibroarthrogram in the context of the TMJ, further improving the diagnosing process.

Keywords: JVA; TMD; TMJ; VAG; intraclass correlation coefficient; joint sounds; joint vibration analysis; repeatability; temporomandibular disorders; vibroarthrography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Box plots of raw features obtained for the first measurement: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.
Figure A2
Figure A2
Box plots of raw features obtained for the second measurement: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.
Figure A3
Figure A3
Box plots of norm1 features obtained for the first measurement: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.
Figure A4
Figure A4
Box plots of norm1 features obtained for the second measurement: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.
Figure A5
Figure A5
Box plots of norm2 features obtained for the first measurement: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.
Figure A6
Figure A6
Box plots of norm2 features obtained for the second measurement: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.
Figure A7
Figure A7
Confusion matrices for raw features used in the JVA decision tree classifier for the (a) first and (b) second signals.
Figure A8
Figure A8
Confusion matrices for norm1 features used in the JVA decision tree classifier for the (a) first and (b) second signals.
Figure A9
Figure A9
Confusion matrices for norm2 features used in the JVA decision tree classifier for the (a) first and (b) second signals.
Figure A10
Figure A10
Confusion matrices for raw features used in the KNN classifier for the (a) first and (b) second signals.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Exemplary VAG signal for (a) asymptomatic and (b) symptomatic temporomandibular joints.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensors and their placement on the subject’s joints.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box plots of raw features: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Boxplots of the norm1 features: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Box plots of norm2 features: (a) TI feature, (b) IB3 feature, (c) IA3 feature, (d) IBAR feature, (e) PA feature, (f) PF feature, (g) MF feature.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schiffman E., Ohrbach R., Truelove E., Look J., Anderson G., Goulet J.P., List T., Svensson P., Gonzalez Y., Lobbezoo F., et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J. Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28:6–27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Svensson M., Lind V., Löfgren Harringe M. Measurement of Knee Joint Range of Motion with a Digital Goniometer: A Reliability Study. Physiother. Res. Int. 2019;24:e1765. doi: 10.1002/pri.1765. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prodoehl J., Thomas P., Krzak J.J., Hanke T., Tojanic J., Thomas J. Effect of Starting Posture on Three-Dimensional Jaw and Head Movement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Res. 2022;13 doi: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakalczuk M., Berger M., Ginszt M., Szkutnik J., Solomiia S., Majcher P. Intra-Rater Reliability of TMJ Joint Vibration—A Pilot Study. Eur. J. Med. Technol. 2017;14:5.
    1. Sharma S., Crow H.C., Kartha K., McCall W.D., Gonzalez Y.M. Reliability and Diagnostic Validity of a Joint Vibration Analysis Device. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:56. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0346-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources