Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 36503505
- PMCID: PMC9743503
- DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01863-x
Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: The SAWHI study showed that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) reduced treatment time by 7.8 days and had a 20.2% higher wound closure rate, but required a 2.1-day longer hospital stay than conventional wound treatment (CWT). The majority of study participants began treatment in the hospital and were discharged within 42 days.
Methods: As an add-on to a multicenter randomized clinical trial, selected aspects of hospital discharge, outpatient treatment continuation, and subsequent wound closure outcomes are compared between the treatment arms in patients with subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascia dehiscence in the per protocol population.
Results: Within 42 days, wound closure rates were higher for outpatients in the NPWT arm than for outpatients in the CWT arm (27 of 55 [49.1%]) for both outpatient continuation of NPWT (8 of 26 [30.8%]) and outpatient CWT after NPWT was finished (27 of 121 [22.3%]). Time to wound closure was shorter for outpatients in the NPWT arm (outpatient transfer with: NPWT Mean ± standard error 28.8 ± 8.0 days; CWT 28.9 ± 9.5 days) than in the conventional treatment arm (30.4 ± 8.0 days). Nevertheless, within 30 study sites with patient enrollment, outpatient NPWT was performed in only 20 study sites for 65 of 157 study participants in the treatment arm.
Conclusions: Outpatient NPWT of postsurgical abdominal wounds with healing impairment is feasible and successful and should be encouraged whenever possible. Study site specific avoidance of outpatient NPWT emerges as an additional reason for the prolonged hospitalization time. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01528033. Date of registration: February 7, 2012, retrospectively registered.
Keywords: Abdomen; Ambulatory care; Negative pressure wound therapy; Outpatients; Wound healing.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Dörthe Seidel reports grant from Kinetic Concepts Incorporated (KCI), an Acelity company, during the conduct of the study. She was an employee of the UW/H. Outside the submitted work but for a study in the same research area, she reports honoraria for lectures and grants from Smith & Nephew, KCI, and from German statutory health insurance funds (AOK-Bundesverband, Verband der Ersatzkrankenkassen (vdek), Knappschaft) for a study on NPWT in diabetic foot ulcers. Furthermore, she reports honoraria for lectures from Smith & Nephew and Hartmann. All members of the SAWHI study group, listed as co-authors, received a case fee for each patient included in the SAWHI study in order to compensate for the additional organizational and especially the documentation effort during trial conduct. Furthermore, all investigators received compensation for travelling to the investigator meetings.
Similar articles
-
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):469-478. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0414. JAMA Surg. 2020. PMID: 32293657 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
NPWT Resource Use Compared With Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wounds With Healing Impairment After Surgery: SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial Results.Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e290-e298. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004960. Ann Surg. 2022. PMID: 34117147 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Use of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of infected abdominal wounds containing mesh: an analysis of outcomes.Int Wound J. 2011 Apr;8(2):118-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00756.x. Epub 2010 Dec 23. Int Wound J. 2011. PMID: 21176107 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
EWMA Document: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.J Wound Care. 2017 Mar 1;26(Sup3):S1-S154. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup3.S1. J Wound Care. 2017. PMID: 28345371 Review.
-
Use of negative pressure wound therapy for abdominal wounds in neonates and infants.J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug;47(8):1555-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.014. J Pediatr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22901916 Review.
References
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Annual Epidemiological Report 2016—Surgical site infections. 2016, ECDC: Stockholm.
-
- World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS), Consensus Document. Surgical wound dehiscence: improving prevention and outcomes. 2018, Wounds International: London.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials