How to support learning with multimedia instruction: Implementation intentions help even when load is high
- PMID: 36504401
- DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12620
How to support learning with multimedia instruction: Implementation intentions help even when load is high
Abstract
There is ample evidence that multimedia learning is challenging, and learners often underutilize appropriate cognitive processes. Previous research has applied prompts to promote the use of helpful cognitive processing. However, prompts still require learners to regulate their learning, which may interfere with learning, especially in situations where cognitive demands are already high. As an alternative, implementation intentions (i.e. if-then plans) are expected to help regulate behaviour automatically due to their specific wording, thereby offloading demands. Accordingly, this study aimed at investigating whether implementation intentions compared with prompts improve learning performance, especially under high cognitive load. Students (N = 120) learned either in a control condition without instructional support, with prompts, or with implementation intentions. Within each condition, half of the participants studied the multimedia instruction under conditions of either high or low cognitive load, which was experimentally manipulated by instructing them to perform one of two secondary tasks. In line with our hypotheses, the results showed that under low cognitive load, both prompts and implementation intentions led to better learning than the control condition. By contrast, under high cognitive load, only implementation intentions promoted learning. Thus, implementation intentions are an efficient means to promote learning even under challenging circumstances.
Keywords: cognitive load; implementation intentions; multimedia learning; prompts.
© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & Midden, C. (1999). To plan or not to plan? Goal achievement or interrupting the performance of mundane behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(8), 971-979. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199912)29:8<971::aid-ejsp963&...
-
- Abelson, R. P., & Prentice, D. A. (1997). Contrast tests of interaction hypothesis. Psychological Methods, 2(4), 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.315
-
- Achtziger, A., Bayer, U. C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Committing to implementation intentions: Attention and memory effects for selected situational cues. Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9261-6
-
- Ajzen, I., Czasch, C., & Flood, M. G. (2009). From intentions to behavior: Implementation intention, commitment, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 1356-1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00485.x
-
- Armitage, C. J. (2009). Effectiveness of experimenter-provided and self-generated implementation intentions to reduce alcohol consumption in a sample of the general population: A randomized exploratory trial. Health Psychology, 28(5), 545-553. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015984
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
