Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production
- PMID: 36504522
- PMCID: PMC9727110
- DOI: 10.1177/01622439211057105
Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production
Abstract
This article analyzes local algorithmic practices resulting from the increased use of time-lapse (TL) imaging in fertility treatment. The data produced by TL technologies are expected to help professionals pick the best embryo for implantation. The emergence of TL has been characterized by promissory discourses of deeper embryo knowledge and expanded selection standardization, despite professionals having no conclusive evidence that TL improves pregnancy rates. Our research explores the use of TL tools in embryology labs. We pay special attention to standardization efforts and knowledge-creation facilitated through TL and its incorporated algorithms. Using ethnographic data from five UK clinical sites, we argue that knowledge generated through TL is contingent upon complex human-machine interactions that produce local uncertainties. Thus, algorithms do not simply add medical knowledge. Rather, they rearrange professional practice and expertise. Firstly, we show how TL changes lab routines and training needs. Secondly, we show that the human input TL requires renders the algorithm itself an uncertain and situated practice. This, in turn, raises professional questions about the algorithm's authority in embryo selection. The article demonstrates the embedded nature of algorithmic knowledge production, thus pointing to the need for STS scholarship to further explore the locality of algorithms and AI.
Keywords: IVF; algorithm; embryology; knowledge; laboratory; standardization.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023. Hum Reprod Open. 2023. PMID: 37588797 Free PMC article.
-
The trouble with IVF and randomised control trials: Professional legitimation narratives on time-lapse imaging and evidence-informed care.Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;258:113115. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113115. Epub 2020 Jun 15. Soc Sci Med. 2020. PMID: 32593117 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF.Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):770-784. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa013. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32240301 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence in the embryology laboratory: a review.Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Mar;44(3):435-448. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 12. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022. PMID: 35027326 Review.
-
Artificial intelligence in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: a review of advancements over the last decade.Fertil Steril. 2023 Jul;120(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.149. Epub 2023 May 19. Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID: 37211062 Review.
Cited by
-
Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023. Hum Reprod Open. 2023. PMID: 37588797 Free PMC article.
-
Using interview excerpts to facilitate focus group discussion.Qual Res. 2025 Feb;25(1):130-146. doi: 10.1177/14687941241234283. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Qual Res. 2025. PMID: 40028392 Free PMC article.
-
Accounting for complexity in healthcare innovation debates: Professional views on the use of new IVF treatments.Health (London). 2023 Nov;27(6):907-923. doi: 10.1177/13634593221074874. Epub 2022 Feb 1. Health (London). 2023. PMID: 35105230 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adjuk Anna, Zernicka-Goetz Magdalena. 2013. “Quality Control of Embryo Development.” Molecular Aspects of Medicine 34 (5): 903–18. - PubMed
-
- Aviles Natalie B. 2018. “Situated Practice and the Emergence of Ethical Research: HPV Vaccine Development and Organizational Cultures of Translation at the National Cancer Institute.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 43 (5): 810–33.
-
- Bendus Allison E. Baxter, Mayer Jacob F., Shipley Sharon K., Catherino William H.. 2006. “Interobserver and Intraobserver Variation in Day 3 Embryo Grading.” Fertility and Sterility 86 (6): 1608–15. - PubMed
-
- Berg Marc. 1999. “Patient Care Information Systems and Health Care Work: A Sociotechnical Approach.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 55 (2): 87–101. - PubMed
-
- Cambrosio Alberto, Keating Peter, Schlich Thomas, Weisz George. 2006. “Regulatory Objectivity and the Generation and Management of Evidence in Medicine.” Social Science & Medicine 63 (1): 189–99. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous