Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 23:13:1024531.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1024531. eCollection 2022.

Dysphagia assessment in ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy: When and how?

Affiliations

Dysphagia assessment in ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy: When and how?

Sriramya Lapa et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Dysphagia is a frequent symptom in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Endovascular treatment (EVT) has become the standard of care for acute stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. Although standardized guidelines for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) management exist, they do not account for this setting in which patients receive EVT under general anesthesia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate PSD prevalence and severity, as well as an appropriate time point for the PSD evaluation, in patients undergoing EVT under general anesthesia (GA).

Methods: We prospectively included 54 AIS patients undergoing EVT under GA. Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed within 24 h post-extubation in all patients. Patients presenting significant PSD received a second FEES-assessment to determine the course of dysphagia deficits over time. Dysphagia severity was rated according the Fiberoptic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS).

Results: At first FEES (FEES 1) assessment, performed in the median 13 h (IQR 5-17) post-extubation, 49/54 patients (90.7%) with dysphagia were observed with a median FEDSS of 4 (IQR 3-6). Severe dysphagia requiring tube feeding was identified in 28/54 (51.9%) subjects, whereas in 21 (38.9%) patients early oral diet with certain food restrictions could be initiated. In the follow up FEES examination conducted in the median 72 h (IQR 70-97 h) after initial FEES 34/49 (69.4%) patients still presented PSD. Age (p = 0.030) and ventilation time (p = 0.035) were significantly associated with the presence of PSD at the second FEES evaluation. Significant improvement of dysphagia frequency (p = 0.006) and dysphagia severity (p = 0.001) could be detected between the first and second dysphagia assessment.

Conclusions: PSD is a frequent finding both immediately within 24 h after extubation, as well as in the short-term course. In contrast to common clinical practice, to delay evaluation of swallowing for at least 24 h post-extubation, we recommend a timely assessment of swallowing function after extubation, as 50% of patients were safe to begin oral intake. Given the high amount of severe dysphagic symptoms, we strongly recommend application of instrumental swallowing diagnostics due to its higher sensitivity, when compared to clinical swallowing examination. Furthermore, advanced age, as well as prolonged intubation, were identified as significant predictors for delayed recovery of swallowing function.

Keywords: aspiration; dysphagia; endovascular treatment; fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES); stroke; thrombectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram detailing the number of patients recruited into the study and reasons for dropout.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plots show the distributions of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at any clinical assessment: at pretreatment assessment, at d0 [after endovascular treatment (EVT)], at first FEES assessment (< 24 h after extubation) and at second FEES assessment. NIHSS is depicted in median with IQR as well as minimum and maximum for each time point. *No NIHSS at FEES 2 available due to reintubation (N = 1) or death (N = 3). FEES, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; NIHSS, national institutes of health stroke scale; IQR, interquartile range.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A,B) Dysphagia severity in relation to NIHSS. For each time point [(A) FEES 1; (B) FEES 2] NIHSS was classified using a visual classification. Each column corresponds to ~25% of the study population. Dysphagia severity is defined as no dysphagia, mild dysphagia (FEDSS 1–3) and severe dysphagia (FEDSS 4–6). *N = 5 patients did not receive second FEES due to palliative procedure. FEES, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; NIHSS, national institutes of health stroke scale; FEDSS, fiberoptic endoscopic dysphagia severity scale. FEES 1: NIHSS 0–8 n = 15, 9–12 n = 13, 13–16 n = 13, ≥17 n = 13. FEES 2: NIHSS 0–4 n = 13, 5–7 n = 13, 8–13 n = 11, ≥14 n = 12.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Age dependency of dysphagia. Dysphagia severity in dependence of patients age (< 70 and ≥70 years) at FEES 1 and FEES 2. Dysphagia severity is defined as no dysphagia, mild dysphagia (FEDSS 1–3) and severe dysphagia (FEDSS 4–6). *N = 5 patients did not receive second FEES due to palliative procedure. FEES, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; FEDSS, fiberoptic endoscopic dysphagia severity scale, FEDSS.

References

    1. Dziewas R, Warnecke T, Olenberg S, Teismann I, Zimmermann J, Kramer C, et al. . Towards a basic endoscopic assessment of swallowing in acute stroke: development and evaluation of a simple dysphagia score. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2008) 26:41–7. 10.1159/000135652 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. (2005) 36:2756–63. 10.1161/01.STR.0000190056.76543.eb - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Khaled M, Matthis C, Binder A, Mudter J, Schattschneider J, Pulkowski U, et al. . Dysphagia in patients with acute ischemic stroke: early dysphagia screening may reduce stroke-related pneumonia and improve stroke outcomes. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2016) 42:81–9. 10.1159/000445299 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martino R, Pron G, Diamant N. Screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke: insufficient evidence for guidelines. Dysphagia. (2000) 15:19–30. 10.1007/s004559910006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donovan NJ, Daniels SK, Edmiaston J, Weinhardt J, Summers D, Mitchell PH, et al. . Dysphagia screening: state of the art: invitational conference proceeding from the state-of-the-art nursing symposium, international stroke conference 2012. Stroke. (2013) 44:e24–31. 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182877f57 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources