Assisted Reproductive Technology or Infertility: What underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology
- PMID: 36505962
- PMCID: PMC9733832
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.06.003
Assisted Reproductive Technology or Infertility: What underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated that assisted reproductive technology (ART: defined here as including only in vitro fertilization and related technologies) is associated with increased adverse pregnancy, neonatal, and childhood developmental outcomes, even in singletons. The comparison group for many had often been a fertile population that conceived without assistance. The Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART) was initiated to define a subfertile population with which to compare ART outcomes. Over more than 10 years, we have used the MOSART database to study pregnancy abnormalities and delivery complications but also to evaluate ongoing health of women, infants, and children. This article will review studies from MOSART in the context of how they compare with those of other investigations. We will present MOSART studies that identified the influence of ART and subfertility/infertility on adverse pregnancy (pregnancy hypertensive disorder, gestational diabetes, placental abnormality) and delivery (preterm birth, low birthweight) outcomes as well as on maternal and child hospitalizations. We will provide evidence that although subfertility/infertility increases the risk of adverse outcomes, there is additional risk associated with the use of ART. Studies exploring the contribution of placental abnormalities as one factor adding to this increased ART-associated risk will be described.
Keywords: assisted reproductive technology (ART); child health; maternal health; placental abnormalities; preterm birth.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: All authors’ institutions received support and travel funds from one or both grants. There are no other conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):327.e1-327.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28400311 Free PMC article.
-
Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):330.e1-330.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28455086 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).Fertil Steril. 2015 Apr;103(4):888-95. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.119. Epub 2015 Feb 5. Fertil Steril. 2015. PMID: 25660721 Free PMC article.
-
Study protocol for a Developmental Epidemiological Study of Children born through Reproductive Technologies (DESCRT).Hum Reprod Open. 2023 May 5;2023(2):hoad013. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad013. eCollection 2023. Hum Reprod Open. 2023. PMID: 37265937 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):270-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28322775 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Ovulation induction and subfertile untreated conception groups offer improved options for interpreting risks associated with ART.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Apr;41(4):915-928. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03060-6. Epub 2024 Mar 12. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 38470554 Free PMC article.
-
Association between Serum 8-Iso-Prostaglandin F2α as an Oxidative Stress Marker and Immunological Markers in a Cohort of Preeclampsia Patients.Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;13(12):2242. doi: 10.3390/life13122242. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38137843 Free PMC article.
-
The risk of perinatal and cardiometabolic complications in pregnancies conceived by medically assisted reproduction.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Mar;41(3):613-621. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03025-9. Epub 2024 Jan 20. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 38244153 Free PMC article.
-
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Risk of Childhood Cancer Among the Offspring of Parents With Infertility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 12;11:e65820. doi: 10.2196/65820. JMIR Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40072918 Free PMC article.
-
Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Ray of Hope for Infertility.ACS Omega. 2025 May 23;10(22):22347-22365. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c01643. eCollection 2025 Jun 10. ACS Omega. 2025. PMID: 40521551 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Stojnic J, Radunovic N, Jeremic K, Kotlica BK, Mitrovic M, Tulic I. Perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40(2):277–83. - PubMed
-
- Henningsen AKA, Pinborg A, Lidegaard Ø, Vestergaard C, Forman JL, Andersen AN. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Fertility and Sterility 2011;95:959–63. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources