Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep-Oct;25(5):463-480.
doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_183_22. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

Antibacterial efficacy of antibiotic pastes versus calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ex vivo studies

Affiliations
Review

Antibacterial efficacy of antibiotic pastes versus calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ex vivo studies

Mohammadreza Vatankhah et al. J Conserv Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Conflicting findings on the potency of antibiotic pastes versus calcium hydroxide (CH) have been evident in the literature.

Aims: To compare the antibacterial efficacy of single antibiotic paste (SAP), double antibiotic paste (DAP), triple antibiotic paste (TAP), and modified TAP (mTAP) with CH on bacterial biofilms.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were comprehensively searched until August 23, 2021. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO. Ex vivo studies performed on Enterococcus faecalis or polymicrobial biofilms incubated on human/bovine dentin were selected. The quality of the studies was assessed using a customized quality assessment tool. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for the meta-analysis. Meta-regression models were used to identify the sources of heterogeneity and to compare the efficacy of pastes.

Results: The qualitative and quantitative synthesis included 40 and 23 papers, respectively, out of 1421 search results. TAP (SMD = -3.82; CI, -5.44 to -2.21; P < 0.001) and SAPs (SMD = -2.38; CI, -2.81 to - 1.94; P < 0.001) had significantly higher antibacterial efficacy compared to the CH on E. faecalis biofilm. However, no significant difference was found between the efficacy of DAP (SMD = -2.74; CI, -5.56-0.07; P = 0.06) or mTAP (SMD = -0.28; CI, -0.82-0.26; P = 0.31) and CH. Meta-regression model on E. faecalis showed that SAPs have similar efficacy compared to TAP and significantly better efficacy than DAP. On dual-species (SMD = 0.15; CI, -1.00-1.29; P = 0.80) or multi-species (SMD = 0.23; CI, -0.08-0.55; P = 0.15) biofilms, DAP and CH had similar efficacy.

Conclusions: Ex vivo evidence showed that antibiotic pastes were either superior or equal to CH. The studied SAPs had considerably higher or similar antibacterial effectiveness compared to DAP, CH, and TAP. Hence, combined antibiotic therapy was not necessarily required for root canal disinfection ex vivo.

Keywords: Antibiotic paste; bacterial biofilm; calcium hydroxide; intracanal medicament.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the identified studies based on The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of TAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm (negative interval favors antibiotic). (b) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of DAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (c) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of mTAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (d) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of SAPs and CH on E. faecalis biofilm (negative interval favors antibiotic).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of DAP and CH on dual-species biofilm (negative interval favors antibiotic). (b) Forest plot comparing the efficacy of DAP and CH on multi-species biofilm
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of SAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (b) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of DAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (c) Galbraith plot comparing antibacterial efficacy of TAP and CH on E. faecalis biofilm. (d) Sensitivity analysis by excluding the outlier from the comparison of DAP and CH. (e) Sensitivity analysis by excluding the outlier from the comparison of TAP and CH

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Karataş E, Baltacı MÖ, Uluköylü E, Adıgüzel A. Antibacterial effectiveness of calcium hydroxide alone or in combination with Ibuprofen and Ciprofloxacin in teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis: A randomized controlled clinical study. Int Endod J. 2020;53:742–53. - PubMed
    1. Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa-Neto MD, Plazas-Garzon A, Basrani B. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper universal in curved canals. J Endod. 2015;41:1718–24. - PubMed
    1. Lopes RM, Marins FC, Belladonna FG, Souza EM, De-Deus G, Lopes RT, et al. Untouched canal areas and debris accumulation after root canal preparation with rotary and adaptive systems. Aust Endod J. 2018;44:260–6. - PubMed
    1. Gazzaneo I, Vieira GC, Pérez AR, Alves FR, Gonçalves LS, Mdala I, et al. Root canal disinfection by single- and multiple-instrument systems: Effects of sodium hypochlorite volume, concentration, and retention time. J Endod. 2019;45:736–41. - PubMed
    1. Siqueira JF, Pérez AR, Marceliano-Alves MF, Provenzano JC, Silva SG, Pires FR, et al. What happens to unprepared root canal walls: A correlative analysis using micro-computed tomography and histology/scanning electron microscopy. Int Endod J. 2018;51:501–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources