Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;11(11):1796-1803.
doi: 10.21037/tp-22-465.

Prevalence of ground glass nodules in preschool children: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Prevalence of ground glass nodules in preschool children: a cross-sectional study

Lichen Zhang et al. Transl Pediatr. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Following increased screening efforts and the use of thin-slice computed tomography (CT), there has been a considerable increase in the incidence of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) in adults. As a result, we have more and more treatments for ground-glass nodules in adults, but few in children. Most think development pattern of pulmonary GGNs is lung inflammation, tumor, or tuberculosis that are more related to acquired or environmental factors. By studying the incidence of pulmonary GGNs in preschool children, we sought to determine whether we had ground glass nodules in the lung before we were teenagers, but we didn't pay attention to them until later. If the hypothesis holds, we may change the cognition and treatment strategies of ground glass nodules. Even not, there are few epidemiological studies with big data that can fill this gap.

Methods: We retrospectively collected the data of all preschool children who had undergone CT at the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from 2013 to 2020. These data were filtered according to the following exclusion criteria: severe artifacts, data with identical names to the original data; and patients without follow-up records (≥3 months). Inclusion criteria: must have undergone thin-slice CT (≤1.25 mm) at the first and last follow-up. Two thoracic radiologists with 5 years of experience and another senior one assessed the images.

Results: There were a total of 13,361 cases after relevant exclusions, 311 patients were finally enrolled. Clinical features: age at diagnosis (year): 3.56±1.84, female: 147, male: 164, follow-up interval (month): 6.90±4.74, leukemia: 99, pneumonia: 21, lung cyst: 8, space-occupying lesions outside the lungs: 69, foreign body in respiratory tract: 6. After manual screening and reading, only 1 patient meets all requirements. The results showed that between 2013 and 2020, the incidence of GGNs that could be basically determined in the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine was 0.32%.

Conclusions: There have been few previous studies of GGNs in children, and based on our study, we found that there is still some associated morbidity for preschool children, it is rarely found when they are young.

Keywords: Single center big data; ground glass nodules (GGNs); preschool children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-22-465/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the method. CT, computed tomography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
GGNs of the left lower lobe discovered on 10 August 2020. (A-C) From 10 August 2020, 19 October 2020 and 26 November 2020, respectively, and the nodules have not disappeared. The blue square indicates the location of the nodule. GGNs, ground glass nodules.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A partial enlarged view of Figure 2, Figure 3A-3C corresponds to A-C of Figure 2, respectively. The blue square indicates the location of the nodule.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Images of a patient who underwent 3 months of follow-up, during which time the nodule in the left lower lobe has not disappeared. As the first time was a thick layer CT, it was excluded from the formal process. The arrows indicate the location of the nodule. CT, computed tomography.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The next two people were followed up for more than 3 months. The report pointed out that the nodules did not disappear, but partial imaging films could not be read, and despite no history of malignancy, physical examination revealed nodule mass. The imaging CT films that can be viewed are all in line with the requirements. The arrows indicate the location of the nodule. CT, computed tomography.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, et al. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017;284:228-43. 10.1148/radiol.2017161659 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bueno J, Landeras L, Chung JH. Updated Fleischner Society Guidelines for Managing Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Common Questions and Challenging Scenarios. Radiographics 2018;38:1337-50. 10.1148/rg.2018180017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chong S, Lee KS, Chung MJ, et al. Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT in Korea: experiences at the Samsung Medical Center. J Korean Med Sci 2005;20:402-8. 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.3.402 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Giraud F, et al. Computed tomography assessment of ground-glass opacity: semiology and significance. J Thorac Imaging 1993;8:249-64. 10.1097/00005382-199323000-00001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 2008;246:697-722. 10.1148/radiol.2462070712 - DOI - PubMed