Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 12;9(1):85.
doi: 10.1186/s40658-022-00517-4.

Detection of prostate cancer bone metastases with fast whole-body 99mTc-HMDP SPECT/CT using a general-purpose CZT system

Affiliations

Detection of prostate cancer bone metastases with fast whole-body 99mTc-HMDP SPECT/CT using a general-purpose CZT system

Samuli Arvola et al. EJNMMI Phys. .

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the effects of acquisition time, energy window width, and matrix size on the image quality, quantitation, and diagnostic performance of whole-body 99mTc-HMDP SPECT/CT in the primary metastasis staging of prostate cancer.

Methods: Thirty prostate cancer patients underwent 99mTc-HMDP SPECT/CT from the top of the head to the mid-thigh using a Discovery NM/CT 670 CZT system with list-mode acquisition, 50-min acquisition time, 15% energy window width, and 128 × 128 matrix size. The acquired list-mode data were resampled to produce data sets with shorter acquisition times of 41, 38, 32, 26, 20, and 16 min, narrower energy windows of 10, 8, 6, and 4%, and a larger matrix size of 256 × 256. Images were qualitatively evaluated by three experienced nuclear medicine physicians and quantitatively evaluated by noise, lesion contrast and SUV measurements. Diagnostic performance was evaluated from the readings of two experienced nuclear medicine physicians in terms of patient-, region-, and lesion-level sensitivity and specificity.

Results: The originally acquired images had the best qualitative image quality and lowest noise. However, the acquisition time could be reduced to 38 min, the energy window narrowed to 8%, and the matrix size increased to 256 × 256 with still acceptable qualitative image quality. Lesion contrast and SUVs were not affected by changes in acquisition parameters. Acquisition time reduction had no effect on the diagnostic performance, as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve were not significantly different between the 50-min and reduced acquisition time images. The average patient-level sensitivities of the two readers were 88, 92, 100, and 96% for the 50-, 32-, 26-, and 16-min images, respectively, and the corresponding specificities were 78, 84, 84, and 78%. The average region-level sensitivities of the two readers were 55, 58, 59, and 56% for the 50-, 32-, 26-, and 16-min images, respectively, and the corresponding specificities were 95, 98, 96, and 95%. The number of equivocal lesions tended to increase as the acquisition time decreased.

Conclusion: Whole-body 99mTc-HMDP SPECT/CT can be acquired using a general-purpose CZT system in less than 20 min without any loss in diagnostic performance in metastasis staging of high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Keywords: Bone; CZT; SPECT/CT; Time reduction; Whole-body.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential competing of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Whole-body 99mTc-HMDP SPECT maximum intensity projections of an 80-year-old prostate cancer patient with different acquisition times. The images are filtered using a Gaussian filter with 7-mm FWHM
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Whole-body 99mTc-HMDP SPECT maximum intensity projections of a 72-year-old prostate cancer patient with different acquisition times and post-processing filters. The 50-, 32-, and 26-min images are filtered using Gaussian filters with FWHMs of 7, 10, and 12 mm, respectively, and the 16-min image is filtered using a Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.48 cycles/cm and an order of 1.2. The 16-min image is acquired and processed using the same parameters as in an earlier study [11]

References

    1. Jambor I, Kuisma A, Ramadan S, Huovinen R, Sandell M, Kajander S, et al. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:59–67. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1027411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helyar V, Mohan HK, Barwick T, Livieratos L, Gnanasegaran G, Clarke SEM, et al. The added value of multislice SPECT/CT in patients with equivocal bony metastasis from carcinoma of the prostate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:706–713. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1334-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, van der Bruggen W, Mohan HK, et al. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1723–1738. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3415-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartel TB, Kuruva M, Gnanasegaran G, Cohen EJ, Weissman AF, Yarbrough TL. SNMMI procedure standard for bone scintigraphy 4.0. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018;46:398–404. - PubMed
    1. Palmedo H, Marx C, Ebert A, Kreft B, Ko Y, Türler A, et al. Whole-body SPECT/CT for bone scintigraphy: diagnostic value and effect on patient management in oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:59–67. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2532-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources