Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;118(5):935-951.
doi: 10.1111/add.16109. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study

Affiliations

Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study

Antonio Verdejo-Garcia et al. Addiction. 2023 May.

Abstract

Aims: Substance use disorders (SUD) are associated with cognitive deficits that are not always addressed in current treatments, and this hampers recovery. Cognitive training and remediation interventions are well suited to fill the gap for managing cognitive deficits in SUD. We aimed to reach consensus on recommendations for developing and applying these interventions.

Design, setting and participants: We used a Delphi approach with two sequential phases: survey development and iterative surveying of experts. This was an on-line study. During survey development, we engaged a group of 15 experts from a working group of the International Society of Addiction Medicine (Steering Committee). During the surveying process, we engaged a larger pool of experts (n = 54) identified via recommendations from the Steering Committee and a systematic review.

Measurements: Survey with 67 items covering four key areas of intervention development: targets, intervention approaches, active ingredients and modes of delivery.

Findings: Across two iterative rounds (98% retention rate), the experts reached a consensus on 50 items including: (i) implicit biases, positive affect, arousal, executive functions and social processing as key targets of interventions; (ii) cognitive bias modification, contingency management, emotion regulation training and cognitive remediation as preferred approaches; (iii) practice, feedback, difficulty-titration, bias modification, goal-setting, strategy learning and meta-awareness as active ingredients; and (iv) both addiction treatment work-force and specialized neuropsychologists facilitating delivery, together with novel digital-based delivery modalities.

Conclusions: Expert recommendations on cognitive training and remediation for substance use disorders highlight the relevance of targeting implicit biases, reward, emotion regulation and higher-order cognitive skills via well-validated intervention approaches qualified with mechanistic techniques and flexible delivery options.

Keywords: Cognitive remediation; Delphi method; cognitive training; interventions; neuroscience; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schema of the study procedure. We had two groups of participants: the Steering Committee (in black) who designed the initial survey draft and participated in all phases of the study, and the Expert Panel (in blue) which includes the Steering Committee along with a broader group of experts in the field derived from a systematic review (in grey) and recommendations by the Steering Committee. The study comprised three main phases including survey development/revision phase (in yellow), survey rating phase (in red), each happening in two discrete rounds based on reaching consensus and analysis and reporting phase (in green). The number of contributors from each source (i.e. Steering Committee [members or nominees] or Systematic Review) is displayed by ‘n=’.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Diagram displaying the flow of the Delphi surveying process. It shows the number of items initially proposed by the Steering Committee for each of the four areas of interest (i.e. targets, approaches, mechanisms or active ingredients and delivery), and how they were subsequently endorsed or discarded by the Expert Panel across two consecutive rounds. (Left) The Steering Committee initially proposed 67 items; during the 1st iteration, the Expert Panel endorsed 36 items (continuous left-to-right flux) and discarded 12 items (black boxes). (Middle) The remaining 19 items (which had reached over 50% but less than 70% agreement in the 1st iteration) plus 3 newly proposed items (fading magenta) were carried forward to the second survey (n=22 items). (Right) During the 2nd iteration, the Expert Panel endorsed 14 items and discarded 8 items, and thus reached consensus for 50 final items.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Expert panel participants’ pooled responses to each survey item (i.e. response percentage for each of the Likert scale options), grouped by item category, across the first and second iterations of the Delphi survey.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Expert panel participants’ endorsement (percentage responses) of different options regarding timing, frequency and duration parameters for the selected intervention approaches. Note. ERT emotion regulation training, CR cognitive remediation, CM contingency management, CBM cognitive bias modification.

Comment in

References

    1. Le Berre AP, Fama R, and Sullivan EV, Executive Functions, Memory, and Social Cognitive Deficits and Recovery in Chronic Alcoholism: A Critical Review to Inform Future Research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2017. 41(8): p. 1432–1443. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Potvin S, et al., Cocaine and cognition: a systematic quantitative review. J Addict Med, 2014. 8(5): p. 368–76. - PubMed
    1. Verdejo-Garcia A, Garcia-Fernandez G, and Dom G, Cognition and addiction. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 2019. 21(3): p. 281–290. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanegraaf L, et al., A systematic review and meta-analysis of ‘Systems for Social Processes’ in borderline personality and substance use disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2021. 127: p. 572–592. - PubMed
    1. Morgan EE, et al., Elevated intraindividual variability in methamphetamine dependence is associated with poorer everyday functioning. Psychiatry Res, 2014. 220(1–2): p. 527–34. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types