Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Apr;55(4):313-319.
doi: 10.1055/a-1966-0661. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

Evaluation of a real-time computer-aided polyp detection system during screening colonoscopy: AI-DETECT study

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of a real-time computer-aided polyp detection system during screening colonoscopy: AI-DETECT study

Ahmir Ahmad et al. Endoscopy. 2023 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Polyp detection and resection during colonoscopy significantly reduce long-term colorectal cancer risk. Computer-aided detection (CADe) may increase polyp identification but has undergone limited clinical evaluation. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of CADe at colonoscopy within a bowel cancer screening program (BCSP).

Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial involved all eight screening-accredited colonoscopists at an English National Health Service (NHS) BCSP center (February 2020 to December 2021). Patients were randomized to CADe or standard colonoscopy. Patients meeting NHS criteria for bowel cancer screening were included. The primary outcome of interest was polyp detection rate (PDR).

Results: 658 patients were invited and 44 were excluded. A total of 614 patients were randomized to CADe (n = 308) or standard colonoscopy (n = 306); 35 cases were excluded from the per-protocol analysis due to poor bowel preparation (n = 10), an incomplete procedure (n = 24), or a data issue (n = 1). Endocuff Vision was frequently used and evenly distributed (71.7 % CADe and 69.2 % standard). On intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, there was a borderline significant difference in PDR (85.7 % vs. 79.7 %; P = 0.05) but no significant difference in adenoma detection rate (ADR; 71.4 % vs. 65.0 %; P = 0.09) for CADe vs. standard groups, respectively. On per-protocol analysis, no significant difference was observed in these rates. There was no significant difference in procedure times.

Conclusions: In high-performing colonoscopists in a BCSP who routinely used Endocuff Vision, CADe improved PDR but not ADR. CADe appeared to have limited benefit in a BCSP setting where procedures are performed by experienced colonoscopists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Ahmad has received research funding and equipment loan from Olympus. N. Suzuki has undertaken consultancy work for Olympus. S. Thomas-Gibson has received speaker fees from Olympus. B.P. Saunders has undertaken consultancy work and received speaker fees, research funding, and equipment loan from Olympus; and speaker fees and equipment loan from Fuji. A. Wilson, A. Haycock, A. Humphries, K. Monahan, M. Vance, P. Bassett, K. Thiruvilangam, and A. Dhillon declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Comment in

Publication types