Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy study: Outcomes and risk factors of conversion during minimally invasive lobectomy
- PMID: 36509569
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.050
Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy study: Outcomes and risk factors of conversion during minimally invasive lobectomy
Abstract
Objective: Conversion to thoracotomy continues to be a concern during minimally invasive lobectomy. The aim of this propensity-matched cohort study is to analyze the outcomes and risk factors of intraoperative conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic lobectomy (RL).
Methods: Data from consecutive lobectomy cases performed for clinical stage IA to IIIA lung cancer was retrospectively collected from the Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy study consortium of 21 institutions from 2011 to 2019. The propensity-score method of inverse-probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the baseline characteristics across surgical approaches. Univariate logistic regression models were applied to test risk factors for conversion. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted using a stepwise model selection method.
Results: Seven thousand two hundred sixteen patients undergoing lobectomy were identified: RL (n = 2968), VATS (n = 2831), and open lobectomy (n = 1417). RL had lower conversion rate compared with VATS (3.6% vs 12.9%; P < .0001). In the multivariable regression model, tumor size and neoadjuvant therapy were the most significant risk factors for conversion, followed by prior cardiac surgery, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, VATS approach, male gender, body mass index, and forced expiratory volume in 1 minute. Conversions for anatomical reasons were more common in VATS than RL (66.6% vs 45.6%; P = .0002); however, conversions for vascular reasons were more common in RL than VATS (24.8% vs 14%; P = .01). The rate of emergency conversions was comparable between RL and VATS (0.5% vs 0.7%; P = .25) with no intraoperative mortalities.
Conclusions: Converted minimally invasive lobectomies were not associated with worse perioperative mortality compared with open lobectomy. Compared with VATS lobectomy, RL is associated with a lower probability of conversion in this propensity-score matched cohort study.
Keywords: PORTaL study; VATS lobectomy; conversion; lung cancer; outcomes; robotic lobectomy.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Minimally invasive lobectomy for lung cancer: Safely finishing what you started.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;166(1):263-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Nov 12. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 36509567 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Minimally Invasive Lobectomy Modality and Other Predictors of Conversion to Thoracotomy.Innovations (Phila). 2019 Aug;14(4):342-352. doi: 10.1177/1556984519849037. Epub 2019 May 17. Innovations (Phila). 2019. PMID: 31099278
-
Robotic-Assisted, Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Lobectomy: Propensity-Matched Analysis of Recent Premier Data.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Nov;104(5):1733-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.06.020. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 29054214
-
Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: A propensity score-weighted comparison.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):2018-2026.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.101. Epub 2019 Jan 23. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30819575
-
Robot-assisted surgery for lung cancer: State of the art and perspectives.Lung Cancer. 2016 Nov;101:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 7. Lung Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27794405 Review.
-
Is VATS lobectomy standard of care for operable non-small cell lung cancer?Lung Cancer. 2016 Oct;100:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 11. Lung Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27597290 Review.
Cited by
-
Lobectomy for primary lung cancer: a comparison of perioperative and postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery.Surg Today. 2025 Aug;55(8):1162-1172. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03000-6. Epub 2025 Feb 17. Surg Today. 2025. PMID: 39960546 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 non-small-cell lung cancer: national trends and outcomes.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 1;65(3):ezae009. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae009. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38263602 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.Surg Today. 2024 Aug;54(8):874-881. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02797-y. Epub 2024 Feb 9. Surg Today. 2024. PMID: 38334800
-
Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary lung cancer: An analysis of initial outcomes based on the National Clinical Database.Surg Today. 2025 Aug;55(8):1124-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-02992-5. Epub 2025 Feb 7. Surg Today. 2025. PMID: 39918571
-
Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in non-small cell lung cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.J Thorac Dis. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):2205-2215. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1482. Epub 2024 Apr 18. J Thorac Dis. 2024. PMID: 38738244 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical