Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 6:15:3729-3832.
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S386879. eCollection 2022.

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain

Affiliations
Review

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain

Dawood Sayed et al. J Pain Res. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction: Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety.

Objective: The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders.

Methods: The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented.

Results: After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain.

Conclusion: The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.

Keywords: back pain; clinical guideline; epidural steroid injection; intervention; lumbar disorder; minimally invasive spine procedure; radiofrequency ablation; spinal cord stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Prof. Dr. Dawood Sayed reports grants from Boston Scientific, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Medtronic, Nevro, Saluda, Painteq (with options), Vertos (with options), SPR (with options), Mainstay (with options), and Surgentec, outside the submitted work. Dr Jay Grider is a stock holder of interlink spine. Dr Jonathan M Hagedorn reports personal fees for research from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Nevro, and Saluda, outside the submitted work. Dr Steven Falowski is a consultant and took part in research for Abbott, Aurora, CornerLoc, Medtronic, Saluda; equity from PainTeq, CornerLoc, Saluda, SPR, and Synerfuse; consultant for Vertos, outside the submitted work. Dr Douglas Beall reports grants from Medtronic, consultant for Merit Medical, IZI (including royalty agreement), Boston Scientific, Vivex (including royalty agreement), Abbott, Cerapedics, Elliquence, Amber Implants, Avanos, Relievant, Stryker, Lenoss Medical, Piramal, ReGelTec, Kahtnu, Stratus Medical, and Genesys; consultant and research grants from Spine Biopharma, BioRestorative Therapies, and DiscGenics, during the conduct of the study. Dr Nestor D Tomycz reports consulting for SI Bone and Abbott, outside the submitted work. Dr Mark N Malinowski reports personal fees for speaking, consulting and/or medical advisory board from Abbott, Biotronik, Nalu Medical, and SI Bone, outside the submitted work. Dr Nomen Azeem reports personal fees from Boston Scientific, Vertos Medical, Spinal Simplicity, and Painteq, outside the submitted work. Dr Reda Tolba reports consulting for Medtronic and Abbott, outside the submitted work. Dr Erika Petersen reports personal fees from Abbott Neuromodulation, Biotronik, Medtronic Neuromodulation, Presidio Medical, and Vertos; research support to institution from Nalu, Mainstay Medical, Nevro, Saluda, and SPR; board of directors, stock options from SynerFuse; stock options from neuro.42, during the conduct of the study. Dr Michael E Schatman is a research consultant for Modoscript, outside the submitted work. Dr Timothy Deer reports personal fees for consultant, research investigator, and/or stock options from Abbott, Vertos, Saluda, Mainstay, Nalu, Cornerloc, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, PainTeq, Spinal Simplicity, and Avanos, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr Timothy Deer has a pending to Abbott. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the U.S. preventive services task force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(3):21–35. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00261-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rivera CE. Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018;29(1):73–92. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2017.08.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C. Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;16(5):761–775. doi:10.1053/berh.2002.0267 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Boxem K, Cheng J, Patijn J, et al. 11. Lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Pract. 2010;10(4):339–358. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00370.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shrestha P, Subba L, Agrawal P, Lohani S. Outcome of transforaminal epidural steroid injection for lumbar radiculopathy: initial three-year experience at Upendra Devkota Memorial-National Institute of Neurological and Allied Sciences, Nepal. Chin Neurosurg J. 2020;6:6. doi:10.1186/s41016-020-0184-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed