Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;49(2):903-910.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02156-x. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

Prediction of distal tibial articular extension in tibial shaft fractures: both posterior malleolar fracture and non posterior malleolar fracture intra-articular extension

Darren Myatt  1   2 , Howard Stringer  1   2 , James Chapman  1   2 , Ben Fischer  1 , Lyndon Mason  3   4
Affiliations

Prediction of distal tibial articular extension in tibial shaft fractures: both posterior malleolar fracture and non posterior malleolar fracture intra-articular extension

Darren Myatt et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Multiple authors have highlighted the increased incidence of occult posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs) with spiral tibial shaft fractures, although other reported associated risks of intra-articular extension have been limited. The aim of our study is to investigate both PMFs and non-PMFs intra-articular extensions associated with tibial diaphyseal fractures to try to determine any predictive factors.

Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. The inclusion criteria for this study were any patient who had sustained a diaphyseal tibial fracture, who had undergone surgery during the study period and who had also undergone a CT scan in addition to plain radiographs. The study time period for this study was between 01/01/2013 and 9/11/2021.

Results: Out of 764 diaphyseal fractures identified, 442 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 107 patients had PMF extensions (24.21%), and a further 128 patients (28.96%) had intra-articular extensions that were not PMF's. On multivariate analysis, spiral tibial fracture subtypes of the AO/OTA classification (OR 4.18, p < 0.001) and medial direction of tibial spiral from proximal to distal (OR 4.38, p < 0.001) were both significantly associated with PMF. Regarding intra-articular fractures, multivariate analysis showed significant associations with non-spiral (OR 4.83, p < 0.001) and distal (OR 15.32, p < 0.001) tibial fractures and fibular fractures that were oblique (OR 2.01, p = 0.019) and at the same level as tibia fracture (OR 1.83, p = 0.045) or no fracture of the fibular (OR 7.02, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In our study, distal tibial articular extension occurs in almost half of tibial shaft fractures. There are very few fracture patterns that are not associated with some type of intra-articular extension, and therefore, a low threshold for preoperative CT should be maintained.

Keywords: CT; Intra-articular extension; Posterior malleolar fracture; Prediction; Tibial diaphysis; Tibial shaft.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Lyndon Mason discloses an indirect financial interest as an implant designer for Orthosolutions. Darren Myatt, Howard Stringer, James Chapman and Ben Fischer declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of 3D surface rendering (A) and axial CT scan (B) of a spiral shaft of tibia fracture with an undisplaced posterior malleolar fracture. In comparison, a 3D surface rendering (C) and axial CT scan (D) of a comminuted shaft of tibia fracture with a medial articular extension
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Multivariate analysis of factors associated with PMF extension of diaphyseal tibial fractures showing odds ratio (circle) and upper and lower bound error bars
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Multivariate analysis of factors associated with non-PMF intra-articular extension of diaphyseal tibial fractures showing odds ratio (circle) and upper and lower bound error bars. Distal tibial fracture was removed from this graph as the OR was too high to illustrate the other factors
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Larsen P, Elsoe R, Hansen SH, Graven-Nielsen T, Laessoe U, Rasmussen S. Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 2015;46(4):746–750. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Emami A, Mjoberg B, Ragnarsson B, Larsson S. Changing epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. 513 cases compared between 1971–1975 and 1986–1990. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67(6):557–561. doi: 10.3109/17453679608997755. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bengner U, Ekbom T, Johnell O, Nilsson BE. Incidence of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. Epidemiology 1950–1983 in Malmo, Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;61(3):251–254. doi: 10.3109/17453679008993511. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Ehlin A, Al Dabbagh Z, Stark A, Jansson KA. Decreasing incidence of tibial shaft fractures between 1998 and 2004: information based on 10,627 Swedish inpatients. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(4):526–533. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015535. - DOI - PubMed