Effect of Left Ventricular Unloading by Pump Speed Adjustment on Myocardial Flow in Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients
- PMID: 36516021
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001875
Effect of Left Ventricular Unloading by Pump Speed Adjustment on Myocardial Flow in Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients
Abstract
Resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) are reduced in heart failure (HF) patients supported by pulsatile left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The effect of continuous-flow (CF) physiology on these parameters is underexplored in CF-LVAD patients. We investigated the impact of CF-LVADs on resting MBF and MFR under two left ventricular (LV) loading conditions. Nine HeartMate II patients (42 ± 12 years, 100% male) on support for 370 ± 281 days were enrolled. Results were compared with 9 HF patients (58 ± 13 years, 67% male, LV ejection fraction 27 ± 9%) and 10 healthy volunteers (56 ± 10 years, 20% male). CF-LVAD patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography with ramp study. MBF and MFR were measured utilizing positron emission/computed tomography imaging under two LV loading conditions: "high-speed" (HS), promoting aortic valve (AV) closure and LV unloading; "low-speed" (LS), promoting AV opening and LV loading. Global resting MBF was similar in HS, LS, HF, and healthy: 0.8 ± 0.3, 0.7 ± 0.3, 0.7 ± 0.1, 0.9 ± 0.2 ml/min/g, respectively; p = NS. HS global MFR was reduced compared with LS and HF: 1.6 ± 0.6 versus 1.9 ± 0.5, p = 0.004; 1.6 ± 0.6 versus 2.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.01, respectively. HS regional MFR was reduced compared with LS in the left anterior descending (1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 2.0 ± 0.6, p = 0.027) and left circumflex (1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9, p = 0.008), but not in right coronary artery (1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.7 ± 0.6, p = 0.76). Resting MBF is preserved among CF-LVAD patients and is similar to HF and healthy. Promoting LV ventricular unloading with higher speed was associated with lower global and regional left coronary MFR, while right coronary MFR did not change.
Copyright © ASAIO 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
P.C.C. is consultant for Abbott; Ulrich P. Jorde is consultant for Abbott. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
-
- Mehra MR, Goldstein DJ, Cleveland JC, et al.: Five-year outcomes in patients with fully magnetically levitated vs axial-flow left ventricular assist devices in the MOMENTUM 3 randomized trial. JAMA. 328: 1233–1242, 2022.
-
- Goldstein DJ, Naka Y, Horstmanshof D, et al.: Association of clinical outcomes with left ventricular assist device use by bridge to transplant or destination therapy intent. JAMA Cardiol 5: 411–419, 2020.
-
- Topkara VK, Garan RA, Fine B, et al.: Myocardial recovery in patients receiving contemporary left ventricular assist devices. Circulation HF 9: 1–12, 2016.
-
- Noor MR, Bowles C, Banner NR: Relationship between pump speed and exercise capacity during HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices support: Influence of residual left ventricular function. Eur J Heart Fail 14: 613–620, 2012.
-
- Cowger JA, Naka Y, Aaronson KD, et al.: Quality of life and functional capacity outcomes in the MOMENTUM 3 trial at 6 months: A call for new metrics for left ventricular assit device patients. JHLT 37: 15–24, 2018.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
