Immediate Weight Bearing as Tolerated Is Safe Following Intramedullary Fixation of Extra-articular Metaphyseal Proximal Tibia Fractures (OTA/AO 41-A)
- PMID: 36518065
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002451
Immediate Weight Bearing as Tolerated Is Safe Following Intramedullary Fixation of Extra-articular Metaphyseal Proximal Tibia Fractures (OTA/AO 41-A)
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether immediate weight bearing after intramedullary fixation of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures (OTA/AO 41A) results in change of alignment before union.
Design: Retrospective Review.
Setting: Level I and Level II Trauma Center.
Patients/participants: Thirty-seven patients with 37 proximal tibial fractures, all whom could bear weight as tolerated postoperatively. Eighteen fractures were OTA/AO 41-A2, and 19 were OTA/AO 41-A3.
Intervention: Intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures.
Main outcome measurements: Change in fracture alignment or loss of reduction.
Results: The average change in coronal alignment at the final follow-up was 1.22 ± 1.28 degrees of valgus and 1.03 ± 1.05 degrees of extension in the sagittal plane. Twenty-five patients demonstrated excellent initial alignment, 10 patients demonstrated acceptable initial alignment, and 2 patients demonstrated poor initial alignment. Five patients demonstrated a change in alignment from excellent to acceptable at the final follow-up. No patient went from excellent or acceptable initial alignment to poor final alignment. Five patients required unplanned secondary surgical procedures. Two patients required return to the operating room for soft-tissue coverage procedures, 2 patients required surgical debridement of a postoperative infection, and 1 patient underwent debridement and exchange nailing of an infected nonunion. No patient underwent revision for implant failure or loss of reduction.
Conclusion: Immediate weight bearing after intramedullary fixation of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures (OTA/AO 41A) led to minimal change in alignment at final postoperative radiographs.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Gaebler C, Berger U, Schandelmaier P, et al. Rates and odds ratios for complications in closed and open tibial fractures treated with unreamed, small diameter tibial nails: a multicenter analysis of 467 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:415–423.
-
- Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P, et al. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2567–2578.
-
- Lang GJ, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ, et al. Proximal third tibial shaft fractures. Should they be nailed? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;(315):64–74.
-
- Freedman EL, Johnson EE. Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:25–33.
-
- Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification Compendium - 2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 1):S1–S170.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
