Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Hindfoot Fusion Nails Used for Acute Lower Extremity Trauma in a High-Risk Patient Population
- PMID: 36518067
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002466
Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Hindfoot Fusion Nails Used for Acute Lower Extremity Trauma in a High-Risk Patient Population
Abstract
Objective: To determine the outcomes of high-risk patients treated with tibiotalocalcaneal hindfoot fusion nails.
Design: Retrospective case series.
Setting: Level I trauma center.
Patients/participants: Between January 2007 and December 2016, 50 patients with significant medical comorbidities treated with a tibiotalocalcaneal hindfoot fusion nail in the setting of acute distal tibia and ankle trauma considered to be limb-threatening.
Intervention: Tibiotalocalcaneal hindfoot fusion nail.
Main outcome measurements: Two-year cumulative incidence of unplanned reoperation and estimated survival with limb salvage at 2 years.
Results: Of the 50 patients, 20 (38%) had an unplanned reoperation (mean: 2.5 reoperations), including 19 for implant removal, 11 for irrigation and debridement and/or placement of an antibiotic delivery device, and 4 for revision fusion. Three patients required amputation and 3 patients died within 2 years of injury, resulting in an estimated survival with limb salvage at 2 years of 79% (95% confidence interval: 67%-91%). After accounting for the competing risk of death and incomplete follow-up, the 2-year cumulative incidence of unplanned reoperation was 64% (95% confidence interval: 62%-67%).
Conclusions: Patients in this series experienced a high rate of return to the operating room but a relatively low rate of amputation. Because patients were indicated for this course of treatment on the basis of comorbidities felt to put them at high risk of loss of limb with traditional treatment, acute hindfoot fusion nailing might represent a viable option in select high-risk patients and injuries. Clinicians should be aware that complications are still common.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
N. N. O'Hara receives stock or stock options from Arbutus Medical, Inc, unrelated to this work. R. V. O'Toole serves as a paid consultant for Lincotek and Smith & Nephew, receives stock or stock options from Imagen, and receives royalties from Lincotek, all unrelated to this work. M. F. Sciadini serves as a paid consult for Globus Medical and Stryker, receives stock or stock options from Stryker, and receives royalties from Globus Medical, all unrelated to this work. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest. No external funding was received for this work.
Comment in
-
Commentary on: Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Hindfoot Fusion Nails Used for Acute Lower Extremity Trauma in a High-Risk Patient Population.J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jan 1;37(1):e12-e13. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002467. J Orthop Trauma. 2023. PMID: 36518068 No abstract available.
References
-
- Williams TM, Nepola JV, DeCoster TA, et al. Factors affecting outcome in tibial plafond fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:93–98.
-
- Sirkin M, Sanders R, DiPasquale T, et al. A staged protocol for soft tissue management in the treatment of complex tibial pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:S32–S38.
-
- Bear J, Rollick N, Helfet D. Evolution in management of tibial plafond fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11:537–545.
-
- Pollak AN, McCarthy ML, Bess RS, et al. Outcomes after treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85:1893–1900.
-
- Abebe E, Farrell DJ, Zelle B, et al. Primary posterior blade plate tibiotalar arthrodesis: a salvage procedure for complex nonreconstructable pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:S30–S33.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials