Timing of Prone Positioning During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- PMID: 36519981
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005705
Timing of Prone Positioning During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the association of timing to prone positioning (PP) during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) with the probability of being discharged alive from the ICU at 90 days (primary endpoint) and the improvement of the respiratory system compliance (Cpl,rs).
Design: Pooled individual data analysis from five original observational cohort studies.
Setting: European extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers.
Patients: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients who underwent PP during ECMO.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Time to PP during V-V ECMO was explored both as a continuous and a categorical variable with Cox proportional hazard models. Three hundred patients were included in the analysis. The longer the time to PP during V-V ECMO, the lower the adjusted probability of alive ICU discharge (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 for each day increase; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93). Two hundred twenty-three and 77 patients were included in the early PP (≤ 5 d) and late PP (> 5 d) groups, respectively. The cumulative 90-day probability of being discharged alive from the ICU was 61% in the early PP group vs 36% in the late PP group (log-rank test, p <0.001). This benefit was maintained after adjustment for confounders (adjusted HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.66-3.81; p <0.001). In the early PP group, PP was associated with a significant improvement of Cpl,rs (4 ± 9 mL/cm H2O vs 0 ± 12 in the late PP group, p=0.038).
Conclusions: In a large cohort of ARDS patients on ECMO, early PP during ECMO was associated with a higher probability of being discharged alive from the ICU at 90 days and a greater improvement of Cpl,rs.
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Guervilly reports fees from Xenios Fresenus Medical Care; Dr. Grasselli received personal fees (payment for lectures) and travel/congress registration support from Getinge, MSD, Draeger Medical, Fisher & Paykel, Cook Medical, and Pfizer; Dr. Schmidt reported personal fees from Getinge, Drager, and Xenios, all unrelated with the present work. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Controversial Efficacy of Early Timing of Prone Positioning for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Crit Care Med. 2023 Jul 1;51(7):e148-e149. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005899. Epub 2023 Jun 15. Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37318299 No abstract available.
References
-
- Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard J-C, et al.: Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:2159–2168
-
- Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, et al.: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:1965–1975
-
- Abrams D, Agerstrand C, Beitler JR, et al.: Risks and benefits of ultra-lung-protective invasive mechanical ventilation strategies with a focus on extracorporeal support. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022; 205:873–882
-
- Abrams D, Schmidt M, Pham T, et al.: Mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome during extracorporeal life support. Research and practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020; 201:514–525
-
- Guervilly C, Prud’homme E, Pauly V, et al.: Prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: Time for a randomized trial? Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45:1040–1042
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous