Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0278847.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278847. eCollection 2022.

Leadership models in era of new technological challenges in construction projects

Affiliations

Leadership models in era of new technological challenges in construction projects

Jarosław Górecki et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The building sector is under the significant influence of emerging technologies. Structures shape the environment and "consume" natural resources throughout their life cycle. They "live" many years after the construction which implies a dependence on some generations of supporting technologies. They can be useful in the subsequent phases: design, construction, maintenance and demolition. They may refer to main processes (construction production) as well as to concurrent processes (management, accountancy, logistics etc.). Computers, automated tools and machines or other intelligent devices seem to be inevitable in the 21st century. Therefore, contractors of construction projects should be sensitive to these issues. Based on literature studies, the article revealed that knowledge management in a construction company should primarily rely on the corporate culture that manifests a preference for computer-aided methods. This part was supplemented by a questionnaire technique and a statistical analysis of the results. It was concluded that the path to technological maturity of the construction company is a continual process. Consistency in this pursuit enables effective promotion of innovative technologies in the construction company. The research allowed us to draw three explicit phases: lack of experience, euphoria, and experience in becoming a technologically matured enterprise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Business process map in companies involved in construction projects–specification of supporting processes including technical support.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Word cloud based on concepts connected with new technologies connected with the construction sector.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Popularity of communication technologies over last 60 years according to [44].
Fig 4
Fig 4. Discrepancy of the Internet connectivity in various parts of the globe.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Size of the enterprise represented by the respondents.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Distribution of experience in managing construction works represented by the respondents.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Histogram based on respondents’ propensity to adapt transformational style in relation to question TF-1.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Histogram based on respondents’ propensity to adapt transformational style in relation to question TF-2.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Histogram based on respondents’ propensity to adapt transformational style in relation to question TF-3.
Fig 10
Fig 10. Histogram based on respondents’ propensity to adapt transactional style in relation to question TA-1.
Fig 11
Fig 11. Histogram based on respondents’ propensity to adapt transactional style in relation to question TA-2.
Fig 12
Fig 12. Histogram based on respondents’ propensity to adapt transactional style in relation to question TA-3.
Fig 13
Fig 13. Histograms based on respondents’ propensity to adapt passive/avoidant style in relation to question PA-1.
Fig 14
Fig 14. Histograms based on respondents’ propensity to adapt passive/avoidant style in relation to question PA-2.
Fig 15
Fig 15. Histograms based on respondents’ propensity to adapt passive/avoidant style in relation to question PA-3.
Fig 16
Fig 16. Distribution of experience in managing construction works represented by the respondents.
Fig 17
Fig 17. The pursuit of high perfection in meeting technological requirements in construction companies—Stage one: Lack of experience.
Fig 18
Fig 18. The pursuit of high perfection in meeting technological requirements in construction companies—Stage two: Euphoria.
Fig 19
Fig 19. The pursuit of high perfection in meeting technological requirements in construction companies—Stage three: Full experience.
Fig 20
Fig 20. Evolutionary leadership model for effective knowledge diffusion about technology in a construction company.

References

    1. Fastenau W. Zublin Space Truss System. Elsevier Applied Science Publ; 1984. pp. 879–884.
    1. Opitz MW, Norford LK, Matrosov Yu A, Butovsky IN. Energy consumption and conservation in the Russian apartment building stock. Energy Build. 1997;25: 75–92. 10.1016/S0378-7788(96)00995-4 - DOI
    1. Neelamkavil J. Automation in the prefab and modular construction industry. 2009 26th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, ISARC 2009. 2009. pp. 299–306. doi: 10.22260/isarc2009/0018 - DOI
    1. Blake FR. New approach to custom-built automated hybrid assembly. Hybrid circuit technology. 1990;7: 46–48.
    1. Salam VHA, Jose BT. Low-cost housing technologies—an analysis of the actual cost effectiveness. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Civil Engineering Division. 1995;76: 86–87.

Publication types